[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] >
jboske group messages
- .ua, —Invent Yourself, 2001 Aug 27
- This is only a test, —cowan, 2001 Sep 24
- Re: [lojban] Q-kau 2002: halfway towards a solution/resolution —Invent Yourself, 2002 Jan 18
- [jboske] Re: [lojban] Q-kau 2002: halfway towards a solution/resolution —And Rosta, 2002 Jan 21
- Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 12
- Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 12
- Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies, —And Rosta, 2002 Feb 13
- RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 14
- Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 15
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies, —pycyn, 2002 Feb 15
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 15
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 15
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 15
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 15
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 15
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 16
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 16
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 16
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 16
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 16
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 16
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 17
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 17
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 17
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 18
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 18
- Re: [jboske] fancu (was: Anything but tautologies), —pycyn, 2002 Feb 17
- Re: fancu (was: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
- gunma, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 18
- Re: [jboske] gunma, —pycyn, 2002 Feb 18
- Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff, —pycyn, 2002 Mar 02
- Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff, —pycyn, 2002 Mar 03
- Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —Edward Cherlin, 2002 Mar 03
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —pycyn, 2002 Mar 04
- Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —pycyn, 2002 Mar 06
- Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Mar 06
- Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff, —Bob LeChevalier (lojbab), 2002 Mar 04
- RE: sets, masses, &c., —And Rosta, 2002 Mar 05
- [Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —And Rosta, 2002 Mar 07
- Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Mar 09
- useful info post —bnds888hdnn23, 2002 Apr 20
- Subject: Compute virus - but easy to kill —pycyn, 2002 May 13
- Re: [lojban] hoax-alert! Re: Subject: Compute virus - but easy to kill —pycyn, 2002 May 13
- McCawley on existential import —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 02
- more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 03
- RE: Re: xoi'a, —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 03
- <Possible follow-ups>
- xoi'a —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 06
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers), —pycyn, 2002 Oct 03
- more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —jjllambias2000, 2002 Oct 03
- RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 04
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 04
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 04
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 04
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 05
- RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 05
- RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 05
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
- RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 06
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 07
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
- RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
- Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 03
- Re: [jboske] RE: Re: xoi'a, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 04
- RE: [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu [1], —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 04
- RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o du'u (was Re: xoi'a), —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 04
- Re: [jboske] Re: tu'o du'u, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 04
- RE: I like chocolate, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
- Re: [jboske] Re: xoi'a, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
- Re: [jboske] tu'o summary (was RE: Re: tu'o du'u, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
- Re: [jboske] RE: I like chocolate, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
- test, ignore this please —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 06
- more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)), —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 06
- RE: [lojban] Re: a new kind of fundamentalism —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 06
- Re: [jboske] xoi'a, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 06
- Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)), —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 06
- RE: [lojban] Re: Why linguists might be interested in Lojban (was:RE: Re: a new kind of fundamentalism, —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 07
- Re: [jboske] CAI (was: RE: more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)), —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
- Re: [jboske] lexicalizations for truth/degree operators (was: RE: more true, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 08
- RE: [jboske] [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu [1], —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 08
- Re: [jboske] how Lojban got its spots (was: RE: CAI (was: RE: more true, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
- RE more true, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
- RE: [lojban] ui and truth (was: Re: Re: a new kind of fundamentalism) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
- The ugly head of ni, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 09
- RE:xoi'a (I think it is). —pycyn, 2002 Oct 09
- RE: more true —pycyn, 2002 Oct 09
- bi'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] The Alice Translation Has Moved And Changed —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 10
- Re: [jboske] bi'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] The Alice Translation Has Moved And Changed, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 10
- RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni, —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 10
- RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 10
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 10
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 10
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 11
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 11
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
- RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: Re: Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 08
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 08
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 08
- quality-ka —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 10
- Re: [jboske] quality-ka, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 10
- Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni and quality {ka}, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
- Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The ugly head of ni, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 12
- Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The..., —pycyn, 2002 Oct 12
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 14
- Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 14
- Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 15
- Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
- Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: quality ka etc. —pycyn, 2002 Oct 13
- ji'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: Usage deciding —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 13
- a number's magnitude, —bestatn, 2002 Oct 14
- Re: [jboske] a number's magnitude —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 14
- RE: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: Theugly head of ni, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 14
- Re: [jboske] ji'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: Usage deciding, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 14
- magnitude —bestatn, 2002 Oct 15
- McCawley on existential import: summary —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 15
- la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 15
- ke'a/ce'u subscripting —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
- {ka'e nu} versus {du'u}, —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
- Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
- Re: [jboske] la, lai, me, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
- RE: [jboske] la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 16
- Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 16
- RE: [jboske] la, lai, me —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
- Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
- Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
- Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 17
- Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u}, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 16
- scope issues, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
- RE: [jboske] scope issues, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
- RE: [jboske] scope issues —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] scope issues —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
- Re: [jboske] scope issues —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
- Re: [jboske] scope issues —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
- Re: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 17
- Re: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 17
- RE: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: [jboske] scope issues —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
- RE: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 18
- RE: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 19
- lo'e, le'e, —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
- Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
- RE: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 20
- Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 20
- RE: [lojban] Re: zil —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
- Re: [jboske] me+moi (was: RE: la, lai, me, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 18
- Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 20
- Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 20
- Why do we need zi'e?, —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 20
- Re: [jboske] Why do we need zi'e?, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 20
- RE: Llamban, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 21
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 22
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 22
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 22
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 22
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
- RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
- RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 24
- lo'e, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] lo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 24
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] lo'e —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] lo'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] lo'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: Re: [jboske] lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 25
- Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- Re: Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 25
- Re: Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- xorxesian lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 23
- On {lo'e} and various "{lo'e}" —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
- coi xirma, doi xirma, —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 23
- Re: [jboske] On {lo'e} and various "{lo'e}", —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
- plus ca change —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e (was: On {lo'e} and various "{lo'e}"), —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- My last will and testament on lo'e, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] resolving the lo'ei debate? (was: RE: RE: Llamban, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
- Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- Re: [jboske] My last will and testament on lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will andtestament on lo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- Re: RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last willandtestament on lo'e, —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 25
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples of Llam... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 25
- Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate into shape, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- zau'o, zo'au, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples ofLlamban lo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples ofLlambanlo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- ta'e/na'o, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
- Re: [jboske] ta'e/na'o, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 26
- le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 26
- Re: RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debateinto shape, —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 26
- scope of connectives, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 26
- Re: [jboske] le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e, —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 26
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
- RE: [jboske] le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 29
- Re: Re: RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debateintoshape, —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 27
- RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examplesofLlambanlo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
- Re: [jboske] e-gadri & utility of lo'ei (was: RE: RE: Re: lo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
- zo'au, vau —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 27
- RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
- Re: [jboske] zo'au, vau, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
- RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 29
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] zo'au, vau —pycyn, 2002 Oct 28
- RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 29
- Re: [jboske] zo'au, vau —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
- Re: [jboske] zo'au, vau —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
- RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 04
- RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 04
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 29
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 03
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 08
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 08
- Re: [jboske] 'one'/mibypre (was: RE: lo'e, le'e, —pycyn, 2002 Oct 29
- RE: [lojban] djedi li integer, —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 29
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 29
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 29
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 29
- RE: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 30
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —pycyn, 2002 Oct 30
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 30
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 30
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 30
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —pycyn, 2002 Oct 30
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 30
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —pycyn, 2002 Oct 31
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —pycyn, 2002 Oct 31
- Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —pycyn, 2002 Oct 31
- Re: [jboske] ni ce'u (was: RE: The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 30
- lo'e jboske ku fa'u le xuncku (was: putative tense scope effects), —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 03
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:ConcreteexamplesofLlambanl..., —pycyn, 2002 Nov 03
- Re: RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 03
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects, —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 04
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
- RE: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 07
- Re: [jboske] repetition & anaphora (was: RE: ke'a/ce'u subscripting —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
- Re: [jboske] lo'e jboske ku fa'u le xuncku —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 04
- requantification —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 04
- Test: ignore this if you get it 4/11/02 or 5/11/02 (or 11/4/02 or 11/5/02 in america) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 05
- Re: [jboske] Re: inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope e..., —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
- zo'u tu'e (was: Re: putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
- Re: [jboske] zo'u tu'e (was: Re: putative tense scope effects (was: RE:, —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
- The contradiction —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 07
- TEST: please ignore —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 08
- Re: [jboske] The contradiction, —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 08
- Why ro is importing & nobody should mind, —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 09
- RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics, —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 09
- RE: [lojban] Re: importing ro —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 09
- They shoot unicorns, don't they?, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 09
- Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 09
- the triviality of the issue of import —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
- An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably won't, alas), —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
- Re: Re: [jboske] "mu." (was: Why ro is importing & nobody should mind), —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 10
- Re: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably won't, alas), —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 10
- Any recommendations for Logic textbook?, —Allan Bailey, 2002 Nov 10
- Re: [jboske] the triviality of the issue of import, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 10
- Re: [jboske] They shoot unicorns, don't they?, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 11
- so'a, so'e, so'i, so'o, so'u, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 11
- Write-up of importingness debate, —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 11
- Re: [jboske] so'a, so'e, so'i, so'o, so'u, —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 11
- ro da poi broda == ro (lo) broda in all known cases? (rlp on wiki), —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 15
- unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 19
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 20
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 21
- RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 22
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 21
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 21
- RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 22
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 22
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 22
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 22
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 24
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 25
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 25
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 26
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 26
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 05
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 05
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 05
- Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 06
- more on shortening romu'ei stuff, —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 27
- Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy —Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group, 2002 Nov 27
- Re: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 27
- Re: gadri (was Re: [jboske] unresolved debates), —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 27
- Some forwarded messages from the "le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e" thread —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
- FW: carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e, —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
- masses —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 28
- lo ka ? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 29
- Re: [jboske] lo ka ?, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 29
- Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 05
- Re: lo'edu'u, —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 05
- RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 06
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 08
- Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 10
- Re: [jboske] Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 10
- sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
- Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 13
- Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 13
- poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 13
- RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
- RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
- RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
- RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
- Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
- RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
- Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
- anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
- RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- frequency of reified relations (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
- Re: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 11
- Re: lo'edu'u —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 14
- tu'o (was: lo'edu'u), —Adam Raizen, 2002 Dec 05
- Re: [jboske] tu'o (was: lo'edu'u), —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 05
- Baseline voting - time is running out —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 05
- RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 06
- Re: RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u, —Adam Raizen, 2002 Dec 08
- Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 09
- le munje sidbo pe zo mu'ei, —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 09
- Baseline policy voting - semiofficial results —Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group, 2002 Dec 09
- Re: [jboske] Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 10
- kau, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 11
- An essay on gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 11
- more lo'e, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 12
- nu & imaginariness (was: Re: unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 12
- RE: [jboske] more lo'e, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 12
- RE: [jboske] kau, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 12
- RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 12
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [jboske] kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 12
- Re: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 12
- RE: [jboske] kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 13
- RE: [jboske] kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 14
- RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
- RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
- RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
- RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
- Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
- RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
- Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
- specificity of da (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
- RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- ways out of lo'e impasse (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
- more discussion about gadri and singulars (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] more discussion about gadri and singulars (was: RE: kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
- RE: [jboske] more discussion about gadri and singulars (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
- le djacu (was Re: [jboske] kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: le djacu (was Re: [jboske] kau) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: le djacu (was Re: [jboske] kau) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
- Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
- so, singulatives..., —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 13
- poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?), —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
- Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 13
- Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 13
- Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
- RE: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
- RE: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
- RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
- Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
- RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
- Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
- identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
- RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
- ni/jei (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
- Re: [jboske] ni/jei (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
- RE: [jboske] ni/jei (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
- Re: [jboske] ni/jei (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
- Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
- RE: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] so, singulatives..., —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
- makau, dakau, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 13
- kau, take 2, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 14
- Re: [jboske] kau, take 2, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 14
- kau: instantiation, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 15
- lo'e: Solomontean capitulation —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 15
- lo'e: Solomontean capitulation: resend, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 15
- "goi'a", —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
- "solomontean", —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
- Re: [jboske] kau: instantiation —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 15
- lo'ie != lo'ei, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
- RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
- the two views of lVi (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Bob LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
- Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 28
- RE: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
- RE: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 30
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 30
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 30
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 30
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 30
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
- loi'e = loi ?, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
- mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 19
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 21
- job of BF (was: RE: individuation and masses —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
- Re: [jboske] job of BF (was: RE: individuation and masses —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 22
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group,MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] RE: kau: instantiation, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
- Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ?, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
- loi: quantitative claims, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] makau, dakau, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
- RE: [jboske] so, singulatives.., —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
- group loi rejected, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
- Backing off loi, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
- killing kau —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] killing kau, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
- Subject: Re: [jboske] killing kau, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] loi: quantitative claims —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
- OFF-TOPIC: Sampson, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau), —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
- Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
- lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
- The singularisations, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
- Gaps and Ungaps, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: Subject:� Re: [jboske] killing kau, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
- gadri schon wieder mal, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: Subject:† Re: killing kau —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
- nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
- Paper to consider on intensionals?, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
- apologies for allround slovenliness —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
- PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
- RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can weconverge towards a resolution?, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group,, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
- Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
- RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
- Heading for Western Islands, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 19
- depicting a snake, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
- Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
- RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re:lo'edu'u, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
- Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
- Re: RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group,MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ?, —Adam Raizen, 2002 Dec 20
- RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE:Re:lo'edu'u, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
- Re: [jboske] default quantifiers (was: RE: individuation and masses, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
- Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
- RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re:RE:Re:lo'edu'u, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
- Re: [jboske] lau'i = lu'i su'o? (was: RE: anaphora & glorking, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
- Can't keep away, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 21
- Inner Quantifier for Substances, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 21
- Re: [jboske] Inner Quantifier for Substances —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
- Re: [jboske] Jboskeists go down with the pox (was: RE: Can't keep away, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 22
- gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
- Re: [jboske] gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 22
- RE: [jboske] Can't keep away —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 22
- Re: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 22
- ***RO*** lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
- mei, latest cause celebre, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 22
- RE: [jboske] ***RO*** lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
- Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
- Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
- RE: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
- Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
- Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
- Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
- Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
- Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
- Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
- Slashdot jboske?, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
- There are no fundamentalists..., —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
- Collective: definition, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
- lojbanmass, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
- Re: xorxesmass vs lojbanmass (was Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
- Collective and Substance, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
- Re: [jboske] 'Excellent Solution' reprised for xod (was: RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
- piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
- season's beatings —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
- My version of the Solution —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
- RE: There are no fundamentalists.. —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
- fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
- RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
- RE: [jboske] piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 24
- One more try —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
- The word order coup, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
- Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 24
- Re: [jboske] One more try, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 24
- fundamentalism: reply to Nick, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
- big rethink on Unique and other gadri, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
- ka'ai, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
- RE: [jboske] Paper to consider on intensionals?, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
- word-order coup —bestatn, 2002 Dec 25
- consistency vs. back-compatibility —bestatn, 2002 Dec 25
- RE: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 25
- Re: [jboske] big rethink on Unique and other gadri, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 25
- propositionalism redux, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 26
- Re: [jboske] propositionalism redux, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 26
- gadri, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 27
- Re: [jboske] gadri, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 27
- Re: [jboske] Digest Number 134, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 27
- Re: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 27
- Re: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 28
- Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 29
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 04
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 05
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 05
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 05
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 07
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 07
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 08
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 08
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 08
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 08
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 28
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 27
- RE: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 28
- Jim Carter's view of masses, gadri —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
- Supporting the mustelid —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
- Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 28
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 28
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
- RE: Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 31
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 04
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 06
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 06
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 06
- RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
- Re: [jboske] Gricean carpet bombing (was: RE: Digest Number 135, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 28
- A few small points, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Collective: definition, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
- Re: [jboske] Digest Number 136, —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 30
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei), —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 30
- Re: a gadri which will solve all our box/doctor/unicorn-wanting problems (was Re: [jboske] Needed boxes), —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 31
- Fwd: Re: [jboske] lo'e: Solomontean capitulation: resend —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 03
- Re: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 04
- Doing logic in Lojban, —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 04
- Re: [jboske] Doing logic in Lojban —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 04
- da'a, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 05
- Hello over there, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 05
- Kinds, —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 05
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Kinds —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 06
- Kinds —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution, —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 05
- Intensions: W, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 06
- Monty's unicorns —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 06
- Q lo'e —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
- "I want some xodium" —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 07
- Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 07
- erratum —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 07
- Re: [jboske] Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 07
- metric prefixes —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 07
- RE: [jboske] Hello over there, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 08
- 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol), —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
- More from pc Re: [jboske] Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version, —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
- pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and a couple other issues, —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
- Ontology #1, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 08
- lo/le definition, —Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group, 2003 Jan 08
- RE: [jboske] pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and acouple other issues —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
- Re: [jboske] lo/le definition, —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
- RE: [jboske] pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and acouple other issues —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 08
- Re: [jboske] Ontology #1, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 08
- What is a lojbanmass? Quantification, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
- Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
- Subject: RE: lo/le definition, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
- RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
- Ontology #2 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
- Re: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol), —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 09
- Re: [jboske] Ontology #2 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 09
- Retract Ontology #2 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
- Aristotelian vs. modern logic, —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- factivity of nu, —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- talking about 2, —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- Lojban is fxxxed, —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- Ontology #3, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 10
- Excellent Solutions —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- Status of names, —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- po'o, —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- Eating individuals —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- alleged ambiguity of lo —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- twentysomething —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
- Re: [jboske] Ontology #3, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 10
- RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c, —Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group, 2003 Jan 11
- And-Kind, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
- RE: Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
- Transfinites, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
- The un-common-sensical-ness of non-importing ro, —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 11
- Kludgesome Solution #1, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
- intuitive zi'o and middle voice —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 11
- Re: [jboske] Transfinites, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
- Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 11
- Re: [jboske] ExSol ver 4.0, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 11
- RE: [jboske] Kludgesome Solution #1, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
- Subject: RE: [jboske] Transfinites , —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
- Emergence solved, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
- Heh, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
- Oops —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
- Well, might as well burn the bridge now, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
- Substance vs Bit of Substance, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
- Re: [jboske] Substance vs Bit of Substance —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 12
- The mess, the despair, and the Lojban Academy —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
- XS 4.1: the gist, —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
- Counting Nick, —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
- KS1.1: piro —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
- Link on (Intensional) Masses, —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
- KS 1.1: piro, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 13
- Apologies for repeats just then. —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
- Re: [jboske] KS1.1: piro, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 13
- Re: [jboske] Re: Counting Nick, —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
- Re: [jboske] XS 4.1: the gist —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 13
- Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
- pimu of real numbers?, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 14
- Mr Ma'u, —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
- Re: [jboske] Digest Number 160, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 14
- Re: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
- The compromise of uncomprehension, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 14
- Re: [jboske] The compromise of uncomprehension, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
- Re: [jboske] pimu of real numbers? —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
- Gonna read a thesis —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
- Quantifiers and lo/loi, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
- Re: [jboske] Mr Ma'u, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
- RE: [jboske] Quantifiers and lo/loi, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 15
- New Ontology —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 15
- KS Kinds —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 15
- Re: [jboske] New Ontology, —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 15
- loi includes Kind —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 15
- Re: [jboske] loi includes Kind, —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 15
- Re: [jboske] KS Kinds, —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 15
- Opacity and belief, —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 17
- Fwd: Re: [jboske] Opacity and belief, —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 18
- alternative to sedu'u —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 18
- Ralph vs. the Tortoise —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 19
- Re: [jboske] Ralph vs. the Tortoise —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 21
- the new non-mathematical sets —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Feb 09
- RE: [lojban] Nick will be with you shortly —And Rosta, 2003 Feb 26
- 4 solutions to collective/substance, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Apr 08
- long-distance vo'a, —John Cowan, 2003 Apr 16
- grammar & pseudogrammar, —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 29
- RE: [ lojban.org ] - New Post - Salvo 1: 27 April —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 29
- Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar, —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 29
- [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb, —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 30
- Re: [jboske] [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 30
- Re: [ lojban.org ] - New Post - what it takes to be a UI: {kau}, —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Apr 30
- Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb), —Llamb�as, 2003 Apr 30
- Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —And Rosta, 2003 May 01
- Some ideas/questions (long) —oskar2379, 2003 May 04
- rafsi fu'ivla, —Pierre Abbat, 2003 May 09
- TEI, FOI and multiple-diacritic characters, —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 May 11
- "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi, —And Rosta, 2003 May 29
- Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —John Cowan, 2003 May 29
- RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —And Rosta, 2003 May 29
- RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —Invent Yourself, 2003 May 29
- RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi —And Rosta, 2003 May 31
- events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 31
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 May 31
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 31
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 May 31
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 31
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 May 31
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 01
- RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 01
- [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
- Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 01
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
- Re: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 02
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 02
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 02
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 03
- Re: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 03
- Re: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 03
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 04
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 04
- Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 02
- Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 02
- Too far. (was: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jun 02
- Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 02
- Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 02
- RE: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
- Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jun 02
- RE: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jun 01
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 01
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 01
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 02
- Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 02
- RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what weneed (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was:RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
- RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what weneed (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was:RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
- RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
- Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 01
- Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —John Cowan, 2003 May 29
- Re: [lojban] Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —John Cowan, 2003 May 29
- Re: [jboske] Digest Number 196, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jun 02
- Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what weneed (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
- Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what weneed (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
- lo = da poi? Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re:"x1 is a Y for doing x2", —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
- SW, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jun 02
- lo'e, na'o —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
- ga'omi'i —Pierre Abbat, 2003 Jun 03
- RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.), —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jun 03
- Re: [jboske] upcoming gadri war (was: RE: Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.), —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jun 04
- Re: [jboske] lo = da poi? Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don'tdo what we need (was Re:"x1 is a Y for doing x2", —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 04
- Re: [jboske] lo = da poi? Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadridon'tdo what we need (was Re:"x1 is a Y for doing x2" —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 04
- ra, ru [Jordan: please read], —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 18
- Re: [jboske] ra, ru [Jordan: please read], —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 18
- "Have you got five quid"? -- the goatleg rule —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 18
- Some comments on tags —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 16
- Re: [lojban] use of ko'a (was: Re: Re: describing people, —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 18
- cu & ja'a, —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 20
- Re: [lojban] Re: use of ko'a, —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 21
- ntc etc. —Pierre Abbat, 2003 Jul 22
- * broda na brode —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 26
- "What is Lojban" book published —John Cowan, 2003 Jul 28
- Gadri for you, —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 29
- Re: [jboske] Gadri for you, —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 01
- usage of lo'e —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 01
- essentials of a gadri system, —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 02
- gadri designs, —MorphemeAddict, 2003 Aug 02
- Syntactic unambiguity, —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Aug 03
- Re: No static, democratic, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 04
- Intension = lo'e'e Extension, —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
- LAhE and quantifiers, —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
- Just to be sure, —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
- LAhE = lo broda be ?, —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
- three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions, —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 06
- Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 06
- James Cooke Brown speaks!, —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
- [opoudjis@hidden.email: Re: James Cooke Brown speaks!] —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
- Mr. Intension, —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 07
- Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness, —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
- lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope, —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
- Mr. Bird and other carnivores, —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
- pa vs tu'o —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
- tense and atemporality, —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
- torch, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 09
- the one and only - counting and Uniques, —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 09
- loi/lo'e/lo as Kind —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 11
- Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 11
- i yield, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 12
- Where is the current, official machine grammar?, —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Aug 13
- points of agreement so far —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 13
- tu'o: we've already been there, —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 13
- Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper, —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 15
- ma tcini, —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 26
- tags as connectives —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 28
- LAhE, ME & XS, —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 31
- lVi & xod-collectives, —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 31
- extending XS to other gadri, —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 01
- Canonical Quine literature?, —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Sep 11
- sumti grammar oddity, —Llamb�as, 2003 Sep 11
- Re: [jboske] BF definitions, —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Sep 16
- [no subject], —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Sep 16
- mail to nntp gateway —Adam Raizen, 2003 Sep 29
- mu'ei, fau, va'i, —And Rosta, 2003 Oct 02
- The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality, —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Oct 15
- speni —MorphemeAddict, 2003 Oct 16
- Re: [lojban] Re: Tenses (was: Re: consolation), —Martin Bays, 2003 Oct 16
- Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: [WikiChanges] BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo, —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Nov 14
- bu, zo, —And Rosta, 2003 Nov 17
- Test, please ignore, —cowan, 2003 Dec 01
- wiki fault?, —And Rosta, 2004 Feb 11
- Quantification of quoted text (was Re: BPFK Section: gadri), —Jordan DeLong, 2004 Jun 11
- Considering creating a link grammar for Lojban, —bgoertzel, 2005 Feb 20
- Re: [llg-members] ko sidju la by py fy ky —Robin Lee Powell, 2006 Jan 19
- Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definitions, —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 15
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —pycyn, 2006 Sep 16
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 18
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 19
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 19
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 19
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 19
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 20
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 20
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 20
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 20
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 21
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 21
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 21
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 22
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 22
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 22
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 22
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 23
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 23
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 23
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 25
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 25
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 25
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 26
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 26
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 26
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 26
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 26
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 27
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 27
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 27
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 27
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 27
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 28
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 28
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 28
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 28
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 29
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 29
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 29
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 29
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 30
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 02
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 03
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 03
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 04
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 04
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 04
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 04
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 05
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 05
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 06
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 06
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 06
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 06
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 06
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 10
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 10
- Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 10
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 11
- [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 23
- Space necessity, —Hugh O'Byrne, 2006 Nov 12
- Scope of da'i in counterfactual implications, —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2007 Mar 26
- ROI, quantification, and xorlo, —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2007 Apr 10
- the use of tu'a with sisku, —Matt, 2007 Jun 12
- Engelang & Jboske despamulated —And Rosta, 2007 Sep 28
- thesaurus? —james, 2012 Jan 21
- LoCCan3 development ideas., —gleki.arxokuna, 2012 Jul 31
- Message not available
Engelang or Jboske?, —Mike S., 2012 Aug 21
Mail converted by MHonArc
[go to top of page]