[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
| In a message dated 11/6/2002 5:26:45 PM Central Standard Time, xod@hidden.email writes: << Bottom of message 751. >> Since aol would dump me long before I got to that point in the archive, could you give me either a person and date or a keyword for searching. However, if it claims that the epistmology of classical formal logic is not bivalent, then it is simply wrong and so not worth looking at. If, on the other hand, it allows classical bivalence and insists that some other epistemology is not bivalent, then it doesn't support your point and so is not worth looking at. |