[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 pycyn@hidden.email wrote:
> In a message dated 11/6/2002 11:04:57 AM Central Standard Time,
> xod@hidden.email writes:
> <<
> > On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 pycyn@hidden.email wrote:
> >
> >
> > >Well, at best this is true if {jei} always works on [0,1],
> > >which it does not generally.
> >
> >
> > Understand that if you're going to reverse course on this most basic of
> > ideas, there is no possible way we will ever converge.
> >>
>
> Another of the unLojbanic habits you have gotten into in conversation?
> "{jei} : abstractor: truth-value abstractor; x1 is truth value of [bridi]
> under epistemology x2"
> Certainly one of the most common epistemologies is that in which every claim
> is either true or false, with no in between values. The epistemology of
> classical logic, if nowhere else -- but problably the one of ordinary
> discourse on most topics as well.
Bottom of message 751.
--
"In the Soviet Union, government controls industry. In the United
States, industry controls government. That is the principal
structural difference between the two great oligarchies of our
time." -- Edward Abbey