[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni

In a message dated 11/6/2002 11:04:57 AM Central Standard Time, xod@hidden.email writes:
<<
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 pycyn@hidden.email wrote:


>Well, at best this is true if {jei} always works on [0,1],
>which it does not generally.


Understand that if you're going to reverse course on this most basic of
ideas, there is no possible way we will ever converge.

>>

Another of the unLojbanic habits you have gotten into in conversation? 
"{jei} : abstractor: truth-value abstractor; x1 is truth value of [bridi] under epistemology x2"
Certainly one of the most common epistemologies is that in which every claim is either true or false, with no in between values.  The epistemology of classical logic, if nowhere else -- but problably the one of ordinary discourse on most topics as well.

I don't intend to converge with a wrongheaded idea.  Is there ANY evidence that your idea is not wrongheaded?