[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] >

jboske group messages

• [Date Index]
• [Thread Index]

• .ua —Invent Yourself, 2001 Aug 27
• Re: .ua —arosta, 2001 Sep 17
• test -- IGNORE —arosta, 2001 Sep 17
• Re: [jboske] Re: .ua —John Cowan, 2001 Sep 18
• This is only a test —cowan, 2001 Sep 24
• This is only a test —cowan, 2001 Sep 24
• This is only a test —cowan, 2001 Sep 24
• This is only a test —cowan, 2001 Sep 24
• This is only a test —flooboober, 2001 Sep 24
• This is only a test —flooboober, 2001 Sep 24
• This is only a test —yabbadabba, 2001 Sep 25
• This is only a test —a . rosta, 2001 Sep 25
• This is only a test —nicholas, 2001 Sep 25
• Re: [lojban] Q-kau 2002: halfway towards a solution/resolution —Invent Yourself, 2002 Jan 18
• [jboske] Re: [lojban] Q-kau 2002: halfway towards a solution/resolution —And Rosta, 2002 Jan 21
• Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 13
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 13
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 13
• Mathematical terminology (was Re: [lojban] tautologies) —echerlin, 2002 Feb 13
• Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 13
• Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —And Rosta, 2002 Feb 13
• Re: Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 13
• Re: Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 14
• Re: Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 14
• Re: Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 14
• Re: Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 14
• Re: Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 14
• Re: Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 14
• Re: Anything but tautologies (was: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 14
• RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 14
• Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 15
• Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 15
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 15
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 15
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 15
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 15
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 15
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 15
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 16
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 16
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 16
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 16
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 16
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 16
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
• fancu (was: Anything but tautologies) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 17
• fancu (was: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 17
• fancu (was: Anything but tautologies) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [jboske] fancu (was: Anything but tautologies) —pycyn, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [jboske] fancu (was: Anything but tautologies) —pycyn, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [jboske] fancu (was: Anything but tautologies) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: fancu (was: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: fancu (was: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Invent Yourself, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 17
• Re: [jboske] fancu (was: Anything but tautologies) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: fancu (was: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Adam Raizen, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: fancu (was: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —pycyn, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —John Cowan, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: fancu (was: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Adam Raizen, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Bob LeChevalier (lojbab), 2002 Feb 18
• Re: fancu (was: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 18
• gunma —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: [jboske] gunma —pycyn, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: [jboske] gunma —John Cowan, 2002 Feb 18
• Re: [jboske] gunma —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 18
• RE: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —And Rosta, 2002 Feb 19
• Re: [jboske] gunma —And Rosta, 2002 Feb 20
• Re: [jboske] gunma —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Feb 20
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Adam Raizen, 2002 Feb 21
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies —Edward Cherlin, 2002 Feb 27
• Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —pycyn, 2002 Mar 02
• Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —Edward Cherlin, 2002 Mar 03
• Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —pycyn, 2002 Mar 03
• Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —Edward Cherlin, 2002 Mar 03
• Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —Bob LeChevalier (lojbab), 2002 Mar 04
• Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —pycyn, 2002 Mar 04
• Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —Invent Yourself, 2002 Mar 04
• RE: sets, masses, &c. —And Rosta, 2002 Mar 05
• Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —Edward Cherlin, 2002 Mar 05
• Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —pycyn, 2002 Mar 05
• Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —pycyn, 2002 Mar 06
• Re: [jboske] RE: sets, masses, &c. —Invent Yourself, 2002 Mar 06
• Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Mar 06
• [Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —And Rosta, 2002 Mar 07
• Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Mar 09
• RE: [lojban] Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff —And Rosta, 2002 Mar 09
• useful info post —bnds888hdnn23, 2002 Apr 20
• Subject: Compute virus - but easy to kill —pycyn, 2002 May 13
• Re: [lojban] hoax-alert! Re: Subject: Compute virus - but easy to kill —pycyn, 2002 May 13
• McCawley on existential import —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 02
• more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 03
• RE: Re: xoi'a —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 03
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 03
• Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —pycyn, 2002 Oct 03
• more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —jjllambias2000, 2002 Oct 03
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: xoi'a —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 04
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 04
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 04
• more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —jjllambias2000, 2002 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 04
• RE: [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu [1] —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 04
• RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o du'u (was Re: xoi'a) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 04
• RE: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 04
• RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o du'u (was Re: xoi'a) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o du'u (was Re: xoi'a) —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o du'u (was Re: xoi'a) —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —pycyn, 2002 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] Re: tu'o du'u —pycyn, 2002 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: xoi'a —pycyn, 2002 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 04
• more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —jjllambias2000, 2002 Oct 04
• [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu [1] —jjllambias2000, 2002 Oct 04
• Re: xoi'a —jjllambias2000, 2002 Oct 04
• RE: [jboske] RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o du'u (was Re: xoi'a) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 04
• RE: I like chocolate —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: xoi'a —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• tu'o summary (was RE: Re: tu'o du'u —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] RE: I like chocolate —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: xoi'a —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] Re: xoi'a —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] tu'o summary (was RE: Re: tu'o du'u —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: xoi'a —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] RE: I like chocolate —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] RE: I like chocolate —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu [1] —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] RE: I like chocolate —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• RE: [jboske] tu'o summary (was RE: Re: tu'o du'u —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: xoi'a —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 05
• test, ignore this please —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 06
• xoi'a —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 06
• more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] RE: I like chocolate —pycyn, 2002 Oct 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: xoi'a —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 06
• RE: [jboske] xoi'a —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 06
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 06
• RE: [jboske] xoi'a —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 06
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 06
• RE: [lojban] Re: a new kind of fundamentalism —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu [1] —Jorge Llambías, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —Jorge Llambías, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambías, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] RE: I like chocolate —pycyn, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] Re: xoi'a —pycyn, 2002 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —pycyn, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] McCawley on existential import —pycyn, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —pycyn, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] Re: xoi'a —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 07
• RE: [lojban] Re: Why linguists might be interested in Lojban (was:RE: Re: a new kind of fundamentalism —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 07
• RE: [jboske] xoi'a —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 07
• CAI (was: RE: more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 07
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 07
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 07
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] Re: Why linguists might be interested in Lojban (was:RE: Re: a new kind of fundamentalism —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] CAI (was: RE: more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] CAI (was: RE: more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —Lionel Vidal, 2002 Oct 07
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 07
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 07
• lexicalizations for truth/degree operators (was: RE: more true —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] RE: [lojban] Re: Why linguists might be interested inLojban (was:RE: Re: a new kind of fundamentalism —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] lexicalizations for truth/degree operators (was: RE: more true —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] CAI (was: RE: more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• how Lojban got its spots (was: RE: CAI (was: RE: more true —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu [1] —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] CAI (was: RE: more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] lexicalizations for truth/degree operators (was: RE:more true —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] lexicalizations for truth/degree operators (was: RE: more true —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu [1] —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] CAI (was: RE: more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] lexicalizations for truth/degree operators (was: RE: more true —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] CAI (was: RE: more true (was: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)) —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] how Lojban got its spots (was: RE: CAI (was: RE: more true —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] lexicalizations for truth/degree operators (was: RE: more true —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
• RE more true —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —Lionel Vidal, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] lexicalizations for truth/degree operators (was: RE: more true —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [lojban] ui and truth (was: Re: Re: a new kind of fundamentalism) —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] how Lojban got its spots (was: RE: CAI (was: RE: more true —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] lexicalizations for truth/degree operators (was: RE: more true —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] RE more true —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• RE: [jboske] [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu [1] —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —pycyn, 2002 Oct 08
• Re: [jboske] xoi'a —Lionel Vidal, 2002 Oct 09
• The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 09
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Oct 09
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 09
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Oct 09
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 09
• RE:xoi'a (I think it is). —pycyn, 2002 Oct 09
• RE: more true —pycyn, 2002 Oct 09
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Oct 09
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 10
• bi'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] The Alice Translation Has Moved And Changed —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 10
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Oct 10
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 10
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] bi'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] The Alice Translation Has Moved And Changed —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 10
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 10
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 10
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] bi'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] The Alice Translation Has Moved And Changed —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Oct 10
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 10
• quality-ka —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 10
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] quality-ka —pycyn, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] quality-ka —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] quality-ka —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] quality-ka —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni and quality {ka} —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] bi'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] The Alice Translation Has Moved And Changed —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] bi'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] The Alice Translation —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly heads of ni and quality {ka} —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 11
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Oct 11
• a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 12
• Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The ugly head of ni —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 12
• Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 12
• Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 12
• Re: quality ka etc. —pycyn, 2002 Oct 13
• Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 13
• ji'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: Usage deciding —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 13
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 13
• a number's magnitude —bestatn, 2002 Oct 14
• Re: [jboske] a number's magnitude —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Oct 14
• Re: [jboske] a number's magnitude —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 14
• RE: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: Theugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 14
• Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 14
• RE: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: Theugly head of ni —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 14
• Re: [jboske] ji'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: Usage deciding —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 14
• Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 14
• RE: [jboske] ji'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: Usage deciding —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 15
• RE: [jboske] ji'i (was: RE: [lojban] Re: Usage deciding —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 15
• Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 15
• magnitude —bestatn, 2002 Oct 15
• McCawley on existential import: summary —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 15
• la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 15
• ke'a/ce'u subscripting —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
• {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —pycyn, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —pycyn, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
• scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —pycyn, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —pycyn, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: Theugly head of ni —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 16
• RE: [jboske] la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
• RE: [jboske] la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
• RE: [jboske] scope issues —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
• poi'i (was: RE: la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
• RE: [jboske] la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
• RE: [jboske] la, lai, me —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 16
• RE: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: Theugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
• RE: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: Theugly head of ni —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 16
• RE: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] scope issues —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] scope issues —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] scope issues —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 17
• lo'e, le'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
• RE: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
• RE: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
• RE: [jboske] la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 17
• RE: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
• RE: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
• RE: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE:Theugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
• RE: [jboske] la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
• RE: [jboske] scope issues —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
• RE: [jboske] la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 17
• RE: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] scope issues —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] scope issues —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] a quick note on poi'i, ce'u, ke'a, and 'bound ' ka (was: RE: The... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] la, lai, me —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• RE: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
• RE: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
• RE: [jboske] scope issues —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
• RE: [lojban] Re: zil —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
• me+moi (was: RE: la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] scope issues —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] me+moi (was: RE: la, lai, me —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 18
• RE: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] me+moi (was: RE: la, lai, me —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 18
• RE: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 18
• RE: [jboske] {ka'e nu} versus {du'u} —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] ke'a/ce'u subscripting —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 18
• RE: [jboske] scope issues —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
• RE: [jboske] me+moi (was: RE: la, lai, me —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 18
• Re: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 18
• RE: [jboske] me+moi (was: RE: la, lai, me —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 19
• RE: [jboske] scope issues —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 19
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 19
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 20
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 20
• Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 20
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 20
• Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 20
• Why do we need zi'e? —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 20
• Re: [jboske] Why do we need zi'e? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 20
• Re: [jboske] Why do we need zi'e? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 20
• Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 20
• Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 20
• RE: [jboske] Why do we need zi'e? —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 21
• Re: [jboske] Why do we need zi'e? —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 21
• Re: [jboske] Why do we need zi'e? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 21
• Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 21
• RE: [jboske] Why do we need zi'e? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 21
• Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 21
• RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 21
• Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 21
• Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 21
• Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 21
• Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 21
• Re: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 21
• RE: [jboske] Why do we need zi'e? —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 22
• Re: [jboske] Why do we need zi'e? —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 22
• RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 22
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 22
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 22
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 22
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 22
• RE: [jboske] Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 22
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
• lo'e —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
• xorxesian lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 23
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 23
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 23
• On {lo'e} and various "{lo'e}" —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 23
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 23
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 23
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 23
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 23
• coi xirma, doi xirma —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] On {lo'e} and various "{lo'e}" —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] coi xirma, doi xirma —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 23
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 23
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] coi xirma, doi xirma —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• plus ca change —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e (was: On {lo'e} and various "{lo'e}") —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e (was: On {lo'e} and various "{lo'e}") —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e (was: On {lo'e} and various "{lo'e}") —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• My last will and testament on lo'e —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 24
• ontology of meaning (was: RE: lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e (was: On {lo'e} andvarious "{lo'e}") —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• resolving the lo'ei debate? (was: RE: RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] resolving the lo'ei debate? (was: RE: RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] ontology of meaning (was: RE: lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e (was: On {lo'e} andvarious "{lo'e}") —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] resolving the lo'ei debate? (was: RE: RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• summary: the lo'ei debate resolved (was: RE: resolving the lo'ei debate? (was: RE: RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: Re: [jboske] lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] My last will and testament on lo'e —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e (was: On {lo'e} and various —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: Llamban —pycyn, 2002 Oct 24
• RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will andtestament on lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• man-eating sharks (was: RE: RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] My last will and testament on lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will andtestament on lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] ontology of meaning (was: RE: lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last willandtestament on lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 25
• dragon ilks (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] dragon ilks (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] coi xirma, doi xirma —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 25
• loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate into shape —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples of Llam... —pycyn, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate into shape —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate into shape —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last willandtestament on lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last willandtestament on lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examplesof Llamban lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] coi xirma, doi xirma —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples ofLlamban lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• zau'o, zo'au —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My lastwillandtestament on lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] dragon ilks (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debateinto shape —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] dragon ilks (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples ofLlamban lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples ofLlamban lo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples ofLlamban lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples ofLlambanlo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples ofLlambanlo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• ta'e/na'o —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 25
• Re: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —pycyn, 2002 Oct 26
• Re: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 26
• RE: Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 26
• Re: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —pycyn, 2002 Oct 26
• Re: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 26
• le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 26
• Re: Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 26
• Re: RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debateinto shape —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 26
• Re: RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 26
• scope of connectives —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 26
• Re: RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate intoshape —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 26
• Re: [jboske] le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 26
• Re: Re: RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debateintoshape —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 27
• Re: [jboske] le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
• Re: Re: RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debateintoshape —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examplesofLlambanlo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 27
• RE: RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'edebate intoshape —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 27
• e-gadri & utility of lo'ei (was: RE: RE: Re: lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 27
• RE: [jboske] scope of connectives —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 27
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examplesofLlambanlo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
• Re: [jboske] e-gadri & utility of lo'ei (was: RE: RE: Re: lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
• Re: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —pycyn, 2002 Oct 27
• Re: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —pycyn, 2002 Oct 27
• zo'au, vau —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 27
• Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debateintoshape —Adam Raizen, 2002 Oct 27
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 27
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
• Re: [jboske] zo'au, vau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
• RE: [jboske] le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 27
• Re: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 27
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 28
• RE: RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'edebateinto shape —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 28
• RE: [jboske] zau'o, zo'au —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 28
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 28
• RE: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 28
• Re: [jboske] zo'au, vau —pycyn, 2002 Oct 28
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 28
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 28
• 'one'/mibypre (was: RE: lo'e, le'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 28
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 28
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 28
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 28
• RE: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 29
• RE: [jboske] le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 29
• RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 29
• RE: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 29
• RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 29
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Oct 29
• Re: [jboske] 'one'/mibypre (was: RE: lo'e, le'e —pycyn, 2002 Oct 29
• RE: [jboske] le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 29
• RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 29
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 29
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 29
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 29
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 29
• ni ce'u (was: RE: The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] ni ce'u (was: RE: The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Oct 30
• RE: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] ni ce'u (was: RE: The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 30
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 30
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 30
• RE: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —pycyn, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —pycyn, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Oct 30
• RE: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 30
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —pycyn, 2002 Oct 31
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —Invent Yourself, 2002 Oct 31
• RE: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —And Rosta, 2002 Oct 31
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —pycyn, 2002 Oct 31
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —John Cowan, 2002 Oct 31
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer —pycyn, 2002 Oct 31
• RE: [jboske] 'one'/mibypre (was: RE: lo'e, le'e —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 01
• RE: [jboske] e-gadri & utility of lo'ei (was: RE: RE: Re: lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 02
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 03
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 03
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 03
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 03
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 03
• RE: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 03
• RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 03
• RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 03
• RE: [jboske] ta'e/na'o —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 03
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 03
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 03
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 03
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 03
• lo'e jboske ku fa'u le xuncku (was: putative tense scope effects) —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 03
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 03
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:ConcreteexamplesofLlambanl... —pycyn, 2002 Nov 03
• Re: RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 03
• RE: [jboske] le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] zo'au, vau —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] lo'e jboske ku fa'u le xuncku (was: putative tense scope effects) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 04
• RE: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debateintoshape —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 04
• repetition & anaphora (was: RE: ke'a/ce'u subscripting —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 04
• RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 04
• inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] repetition & anaphora (was: RE: ke'a/ce'u subscripting —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] zo'au, vau —pycyn, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] lo'e jboske ku fa'u le xuncku —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 04
• RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 04
• RE: [jboske] zo'au, vau —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 04
• requantification —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 04
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
• RE: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 05
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 05
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 05
• Test: ignore this if you get it 4/11/02 or 5/11/02 (or 11/4/02 or 11/5/02 in america) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope e... —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 05
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 05
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 05
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 05
• RE: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 05
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 05
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
• Lojban for the logical novitiate (was: RE: putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] Re: inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope e... —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• zo'u tu'e (was: Re: putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] zo'u tu'e (was: Re: putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 06
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] zo'u tu'e (was: Re: putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 06
• RE: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 06
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 07
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 07
• The contradiction —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 07
• RE: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 07
• RE: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 07
• RE: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 07
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 07
• recursive debates (was: RE: Re: The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 07
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 07
• RE: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 07
• Re: Re: Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 08
• TEST: please ignore —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 08
• RE: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 08
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —pycyn, 2002 Nov 08
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 08
• Re: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —pycyn, 2002 Nov 08
• RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 08
• RE: [jboske] The ugly head of ni —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 08
• Re: [jboske] The contradiction —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 08
• Re: [jboske] The contradiction —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 08
• Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 08
• Re: Re: [jboske] The contradiction —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 09
• Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 09
• RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 09
• RE: [lojban] Re: importing ro —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 09
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 09
• Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 09
• Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 09
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 09
• Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 09
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 09
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 09
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 09
• Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 09
• They shoot unicorns, don't they? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 09
• "mu." (was: Why ro is importing & nobody should mind) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 09
• Re: [jboske] "mu." (was: Why ro is importing & nobody should mind) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 09
• Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 09
• Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] They shoot unicorns, don't they? —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 10
• the triviality of the issue of import —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• percentages of things (was: RE: Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] They shoot unicorns, don't they? —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] "mu." (was: Why ro is importing & nobody should mind) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] "mu." (was: Why ro is importing & nobody should mind) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] "mu." (was: Why ro is importing & nobody should mind) —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 10
• An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably won't, alas) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably won't, alas) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: Re: [jboske] "mu." (was: Why ro is importing & nobody should mind) —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably won't, alas) —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 10
• Any recommendations for Logic textbook? —Allan Bailey, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (butprobably won't, alas) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably won't, alas) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] Any recommendations for Logic textbook? —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably won't, alas) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] the triviality of the issue of import —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: Re: [jboske] "mu." (was: Why ro is importing & nobody should mind) —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably won't, alas) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] Any recommendations for Logic textbook? —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably won't, alas) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (butprobably won't, alas) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 10
• RE: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (butprobably won't, alas) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 10
• Re: [jboske] They shoot unicorns, don't they? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably won't, alas) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 11
• RE: [jboske] Any recommendations for Logic textbook? —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] They shoot unicorns, don't they? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] They shoot unicorns, don't they? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probably —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 11
• RE: [jboske] the triviality of the issue of import —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 11
• RE: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] They shoot unicorns, don't they? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 11
• so'a, so'e, so'i, so'o, so'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] so'a, so'e, so'i, so'o, so'u —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 11
• Write-up of importingness debate —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] so'a, so'e, so'i, so'o, so'u —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 11
• me'i etc. (was: RE: An importingness story I think we can agree on (but probablywon't, alas) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] so'a, so'e, so'i, so'o, so'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 11
• RE: [jboske] so'a, so'e, so'i, so'o, so'u —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] Write-up of importingness debate —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] Write-up of importingness debate —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 11
• RE: [jboske] Write-up of importingness debate —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: [jboske] Write-up of importingness debate —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 11
• Re: Write-up of importingness debate —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Nov 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: Write-up of importingness debate —Invent Yourself, 2002 Nov 12
• RE: [jboske] Re: Write-up of importingness debate —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 12
• ro da poi broda == ro (lo) broda in all known cases? (rlp on wiki) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 15
• Re: [jboske] They shoot unicorns, don't they? —Edward Cherlin, 2002 Nov 15
• RE: [jboske] ro da poi broda == ro (lo) broda in all known cases? (rlp on wiki) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 15
• Re: [jboske] ro da poi broda == ro (lo) broda in all known cases? (rlp on wiki) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 16
• RE: [jboske] ro da poi broda == ro (lo) broda in all known cases? (rlp on wiki) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 16
• unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 19
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 20
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 21
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 21
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 21
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 21
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 21
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 22
• RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 22
• RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 22
• RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 22
• RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —John Cowan, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 22
• RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 22
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 24
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 24
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 25
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 25
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 25
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 25
• RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 25
• RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 25
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 26
• RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 26
• RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 26
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 26
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 26
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 26
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 26
• gadri (was Re: [jboske] unresolved debates) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 27
• gadri (was Re: [jboske] unresolved debates) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 27
• more on shortening romu'ei stuff —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 27
• Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy —Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group, 2002 Nov 27
• Re: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 27
• Re: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 27
• Re: gadri (was Re: [jboske] unresolved debates) —Adam Raizen, 2002 Nov 27
• Re: gadri (was Re: [jboske] unresolved debates) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 28
• Some forwarded messages from the "le'i, le, lei, le'e, lo'i, lo, loi, lo'e" thread —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
• FW: carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
• RE: [jboske] unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
• RE: gadri (was Re: [jboske] unresolved debates) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
• RE: gadri (was Re: [jboske] unresolved debates) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
• RE: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
• RE: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
• RE: gadri (was Re: [jboske] unresolved debates) —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
• Re: [jboske] FW: carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and testament on lo'e —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 28
• Re: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 28
• Re: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 28
• masses —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 28
• Re: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 28
• Re: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff —And Rosta, 2002 Nov 28
• Re: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 28
• lo ka ? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 29
• Re: [jboske] lo ka ? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 29
• Re: [jboske] lo ka ? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Nov 29
• Re: [jboske] lo ka ? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Nov 29
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 05
• tu'o (was: lo'edu'u) —Adam Raizen, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [jboske] tu'o (was: lo'edu'u) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 05
• Re: [jboske] tu'o (was: lo'edu'u) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 05
• Baseline voting - time is running out —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 05
• RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 06
• RE: [jboske] tu'o (was: lo'edu'u) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 06
• Re: [jboske] tu'o (was: lo'edu'u) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 06
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 06
• Re: Re: [jboske] tu'o (was: lo'edu'u) —Adam Raizen, 2002 Dec 06
• Re: [jboske] tu'o (was: lo'edu'u) —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 06
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 06
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 06
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 06
• Re: [jboske] unresolved debates —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 06
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 07
• RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 07
• RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 07
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 07
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 07
• RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 07
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 07
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 07
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 07
• whorfianisms (was: RE: Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 07
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 07
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 07
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 08
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 08
• Re: [jboske] whorfianisms (was: RE: Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 08
• Re: RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —Adam Raizen, 2002 Dec 08
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 08
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 08
• RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 08
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 08
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 09
• le munje sidbo pe zo mu'ei —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 09
• Re: [jboske] le munje sidbo pe zo mu'ei —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 09
• Baseline policy voting - semiofficial results —Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group, 2002 Dec 09
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 09
• Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 10
• Re: [jboske] Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 10
• Re: [jboske] Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 10
• RE: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 11
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 11
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 11
• Re: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 11
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 11
• kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 11
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 11
• RE: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 11
• RE: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 11
• RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 11
• An essay on gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 11
• more lo'e —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 12
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 12
• nu & imaginariness (was: Re: unresolved debates —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 12
• RE: [jboske] more lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 12
• RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 12
• RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 12
• RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 12
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 12
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 12
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 12
• Re: [jboske] more lo'e —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 12
• Re: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 12
• RE: [jboske] kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 12
• Re: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 12
• Re: [jboske] more lo'e —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 12
• RE: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 12
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 13
• sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
• RE: [jboske] Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
• RE: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
• RE: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
• RE: [jboske] Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 13
• RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 13
• poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 13
• so, singulatives... —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 13
• poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: RE: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Adam Raizen, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: [jboske] so, singulatives... —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: [jboske] so, singulatives... —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: [jboske] so, singulatives... —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 13
• makau, dakau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 13
• RE: [jboske] kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: [jboske] so, singulatives... —Lionel Vidal, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: RE: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: [jboske] so, singulatives... —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 13
• Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• kau, take 2 —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: lo'edu'u —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] kau, take 2 —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] so, singulatives.. —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] kau, take 2 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] so, singulatives.. —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• performative hypothesis (was: RE: kau, take 2 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] kau, take 2 —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] kau, take 2 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] kau, take 2 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 14
• RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 14
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• kau: instantiation —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 15
• lo'e: Solomontean capitulation —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 15
• lo'e: Solomontean capitulation: resend —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• "goi'a" —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• "solomontean" —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] "goi'a" —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: "solomontean" —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] lo'e: Solomontean capitulation: resend —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] kau: instantiation —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] Re: "solomontean" —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] "goi'a" —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• RE: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 15
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 15
• specificity of da (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• ti for whatever you like (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] ti for whatever you like (was: kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] identity abstraction (was: poi'i, se/te/ve ka) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• lo'ie != lo'ei —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] lo'ie != lo'ei —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] lo'ie != lo'ei —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] lo'ie != lo'ei —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] kau: instantiation —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] kau: instantiation —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
• ways out of lo'e impasse (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• more discussion about gadri and singulars (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: kau: instantiation —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
• loi'e = loi ? —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] RE: kau: instantiation —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] RE: kau: instantiation —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] more discussion about gadri and singulars (was: RE: kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• loseka = lo (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
• anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• referential anaphors with apparently referentless antecedents (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• ti (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] ti (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] ti (was: RE: kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] RE: kau: instantiation —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] more discussion about gadri and singulars (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] ti (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• jai ka mystification (was: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• alternative to makau (was: RE: kau: instantiation —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 16
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 16
• RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] makau, dakau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] so, singulatives.. —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 17
• loi: quantitative claims —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] loi: quantitative claims —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• Median (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: poi'i, se/te/ve ka (was Re: [jboske] sane kau?) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] makau, dakau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] so, singulatives.. —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 17
• group loi rejected —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
• loi'e = loi ? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• Masses (was: loi: quantitative claims) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• Backing off loi —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
• killing kau —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] killing kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• Subject:  Re: [jboske] killing kau —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: Subject:  Re: [jboske] killing kau —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] killing kau —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] loi: quantitative claims —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] Masses (was: loi: quantitative claims) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] Backing off loi —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] killing kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 17
• OFF-TOPIC: Sampson —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] killing kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] killing kau —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] killing kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] killing kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] so, singulatives... —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] so, singulatives... —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau, take 2 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau, take 2 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau, take 2 —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] "goi'a" —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] lo'ie != lo'ei —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau, take 2 —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] RE: kau: instantiation —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] RE: kau: instantiation —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] ti (was: RE: kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] ti (was: RE: kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] loi: quantitative claims —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] so, singulatives.. —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] makau, dakau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• RE: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] group loi rejected —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] Masses (was: loi: quantitative claims) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] so, singulatives.. —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] OFF-TOPIC: Sampson —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] kau, take 2 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] so, singulatives.. —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 17
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• must lo'e be imaginary? (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] makau, dakau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• the two views of lVi (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• jei clani (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] jei clani (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• The singularisations —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] jei clani (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] The singularisations —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] loi: quantitative claims —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] so, singulatives.. —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• Gaps and Ungaps —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ? —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Gaps and Ungaps —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] loi: quantitative claims —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] kau —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Bob LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Bob LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Bob LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —Bob LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —Bob LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] kau —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• jboske & linguistics (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: Subject:� Re: [jboske] killing kau —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• gadri schon wieder mal —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: Subject:† Re: killing kau —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
• nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Paper to consider on intensionals? —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• apologies for allround slovenliness —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 18
• le djacu (was Re: [jboske] kau) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Beatles' legs (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a" —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• frequency of reified relations (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• stedu (be mi) (was: RE: kau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• wondering: sepi'o zo du'au (was: RE: kau, take 2 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Off-site jboske help (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: zifsnu: PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• =?x-unknown?q?Re=3A_Subject=3A=A0_Re=3A_=5Bjboske=5D_killing_ka?==?x-unknown?q?u?= —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a" —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a" —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: le djacu (was Re: [jboske] kau) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] gadri schon wieder mal —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can weconverge towards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• lau'V gadri (was: RE: individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: zifsnu: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: zifsnu: [jboske] lau'V gadri (was: RE: individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can weconverge towards a resolution? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct forjboske participants —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct forjboske participants —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can weconverge towards a resolution? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: zifsnu: [jboske] lau'V gadri (was: RE: individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: canweconverge towards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: zifsnu: [jboske] lau'V gadri (was: RE: individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can weconvergetowards a resolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct forjboskeparticipants —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: zifsnu: [jboske] lau'V gadri (was: RE: individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: canweconverge towards a resolution? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —throwing_back_the_apple <xod@hidden.email>, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 18
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
• RE: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 19
• Heading for Western Islands —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 19
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re:lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
• depicting a snake —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 19
• Interim summary of gadri types (was: RE: Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
• No Protocol for Jboske (was: RE: Heading for Western Islands —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group,MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Heading for Western Islands —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re:lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] depicting a snake —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 19
• CON: Substance is not Collective (was: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?)) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] CON: Substance is not Collective (was: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?)) —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 19
• CON Substance is not Collective (was: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?)) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] depicting a snake —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] CON Substance is not Collective (was: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?)) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 19
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE:Re:lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] depicting a snake —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group,MrThing(was: RE: loi'e = loi ? —Adam Raizen, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we convergetowards aresolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE:Re:lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE:Re:lo'edu'u —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE:Re:lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• default quantifiers (was: RE: individuation and masses —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] default quantifiers (was: RE: individuation and masses —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we convergetowards aresolution? —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re:RE:Re:lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re:RE:Re:lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re:RE:Re:lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we convergetowards aresolution? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re:RE:Re:lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 20
• lau'i = lu'i su'o? (was: RE: anaphora & glorking —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 20
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re:RE:Re:lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• Re: [jboske] lau'i = lu'i su'o? (was: RE: anaphora & glorking —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] default quantifiers (was: RE: individuation and masses —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re:RE:Re:lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] lau'i = lu'i su'o? (was: RE: anaphora & glorking —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] default quantifiers (was: RE: individuation and masses —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] lau'i = lu'i su'o? (was: RE: anaphora & glorking —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• Can't keep away —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 21
• Inner Quantifier for Substances —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 21
• Re: [jboske] Can't keep away —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] default quantifiers (was: RE: individuation and masses —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] lau'i = lu'i su'o? (was: RE: anaphora & glorking —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] Inner Quantifier for Substances —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re:RE:Re:lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• Jboskeists go down with the pox (was: RE: Can't keep away —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] Can't keep away —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• job of BF (was: RE: individuation and masses —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• Re: [jboske] Inner Quantifier for Substances —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] makau, dakau —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• ni/jei (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] gadri schon wieder mal —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a" —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a" —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: le djacu (was Re: [jboske] kau) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] default quantifiers (was: RE: individuation and masses —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re:RE:Re:lo'edu'u —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 21
• Re: [jboske] Jboskeists go down with the pox (was: RE: Can't keep away —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 22
• gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] whorfianisms (was: RE: Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] default quantifiers (was: RE: individuation and masses —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re:RE:Re:lo'edu'u —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] Jboskeists go down with the pox (was: RE: Can't keep away —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] Can't keep away —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] job of BF (was: RE: individuation and masses —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] Can't keep away —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] ni/jei (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a" —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 22
• ***RO*** lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: ***RO*** lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 22
• mei, latest cause celebre —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] Can't keep away —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] ni/jei (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a" —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] Re: ***RO*** lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] ***RO*** lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] ni/jei (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a" —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 22
• Re: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 22
• lojbanmasses (was: RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] ***RO*** lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 22
• RE: [jboske] ***RO*** lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
• Slashdot jboske? —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] Slashdot jboske? —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
• There are no fundamentalists... —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
• Collective: definition —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
• lojbanmass —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• ideologies (was: RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] ***RO*** lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• xorxesmass vs lojbanmass (was Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] Collective: definition —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] lojbanmass —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] ideologies (was: RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: xorxesmass vs lojbanmass (was Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] Collective: definition —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] ideologies (was: RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 23
• Collective and Substance —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] There are no fundamentalists.. —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] There are no fundamentalists.. —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] Collective and Substance —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 23
• fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] lojbanmass —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] Collective and Substance —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• 'Excellent Solution' reprised for xod (was: RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] 'Excellent Solution' reprised for xod (was: RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] Collective: definition —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] Collective: definition —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 23
• more on Collectives (was: RE: mei, latest cause celebre —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] 'Excellent Solution' reprised for xod (was: RE:fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] 'Excellent Solution' reprised for xod (was: RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] Collective: definition —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 23
• piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] 'Excellent Solution' reprised for xod (was: RE:fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 23
• RE: [jboske] Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] ideologies (was: RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] 'Excellent Solution' reprised for xod (was: RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 23
• Re: [jboske] ideologies (was: RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 23
• a glorking 'logic' for Collective and substance (was: RE: Collective: definition —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• Lojban sets (was: RE: Collective: definition —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• Lojbab on ideologies (was: RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 23
• season's beatings —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• My version of the Solution —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: Collective: definition —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: Collective and Substance —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: There are no fundamentalists.. —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 24
• One more try —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] Re: Collective and Substance —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 24
• The word order coup —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] One more try —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] The word order coup —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 24
• Nixon Prenexes (was: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] Nixon Prenexes (was: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] Nixon Prenexes (was: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• fundamentalism: reply to Nick —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadriparadigm:2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] Paper to consider on intensionals? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] Nixon Prenexes (was: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadriparadigm:2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• big rethink on Unique and other gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• ka'ai —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] Paper to consider on intensionals? —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] Paper to consider on intensionals? —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] ka'ai —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• Re: fundamentalism: reply to Nick —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] Re: fundamentalism: reply to Nick —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• RE: [jboske] Re: fundamentalism: reply to Nick —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 24
• word-order coup —bestatn, 2002 Dec 25
• consistency vs. back-compatibility —bestatn, 2002 Dec 25
• Re: [jboske] One more try —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 25
• Re: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 25
• RE: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 25
• RE: [jboske] One more try —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 25
• RE: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 25
• RE: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 25
• RE: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 25
• Re: [jboske] big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 25
• RE: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 25
• Re: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 25
• RE: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 25
• Re: [jboske] One more try —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 25
• RE: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 26
• RE: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 26
• RE: [jboske] big rethink on Unique and other gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 26
• Re: [jboske] One more try —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 26
• Re: [jboske] One more try —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 26
• RE: [jboske] big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 26
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 26
• Re: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 26
• Re: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 26
• Re: [jboske] Re: fundamentalism: reply to Nick —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 26
• propositionalism redux —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 26
• RE: [jboske] big rethink on Unique and other gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 26
• Uniques (was: RE: RE: fundamentalism as fundamental —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 26
• Re: [jboske] propositionalism redux —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 26
• Re: [jboske] Uniques (was: RE: RE: fundamentalism as fundamental —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 26
• RE: [jboske] Uniques (was: RE: RE: fundamentalism as fundamental —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 27
• RE: [jboske] propositionalism redux —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 27
• RE: [jboske] propositionalism redux —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
• gadri —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] Collective: definition —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] more on Collectives (was: RE: mei, latest cause celebre —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] gadri —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] gadri —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
• Jim Carter's view of masses, gadri —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
• RE: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 27
• RE: [jboske] mei, latest cause celebre —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 27
• RE: [jboske] fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 27
• RE: [jboske] gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] gadri —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] Re: fundamentalism: reply to Nick —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 27
• Re: [jboske] gadri —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 27
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 27
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] propositionalism redux —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] gadri —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 28
• Supporting the mustelid —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] propositionalism redux —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• Nick on lo'e (was: RE: gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] propositionalism redux —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 134 —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Re: big rethink on Unique and other gadri —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 28
• De dicto/de re, or Ortcutt recapitulated —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Nick on lo'e (was: RE: gadri —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 28
• Nixon Prenex? (was Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 28
• guaspi any (was: RE: Digest Number 135 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Nick on lo'e (was: RE: gadri —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Gricean carpet bombing (was: RE: Digest Number 135 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] guaspi any (was: RE: Digest Number 135 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Gricean carpet bombing (was: RE: Digest Number 135 —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Gricean carpet bombing (was: RE: Digest Number 135 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• evangel of sets (was: RE: Digest Number 135 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] propositionalism redux —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] guaspi any (was: RE: Digest Number 135 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] evangel of sets (was: RE: Digest Number 135 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] guaspi any (was: RE: Digest Number 135 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• Re: [jboske] Collective: definition —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] gadri —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Gricean carpet bombing (was: RE: Digest Number 135 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] propositionalism redux —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 28
• A few small points —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] gadri —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] propositionalism redux —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Collective: definition —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] A few small points —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 29
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Collective: definition —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Collective: definition —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• RE: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 29
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 29
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
• RE: [jboske] propositionalism redux —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 29
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 136 —Nick Nicholas, 2002 Dec 30
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 30
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 30
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 30
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 30
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 136 —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 30
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 30
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 136 —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 30
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 30
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 136 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 30
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 31
• RE: Re: [jboske] Digest Number 136 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 31
• RE: Re: [jboske] Digest Number 136 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 31
• RE: Re: [jboske] Digest Number 136 —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 31
• RE: Re: [jboske] propositionalism redux —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 31
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 31
• RE: Re: [jboske] Digest Number 135 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 31
• RE: Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2002 Dec 31
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 31
• a gadri which will solve all our box/doctor/unicorn-wanting problems (was Re: [jboske] Needed boxes) —Jordan DeLong, 2002 Dec 31
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Robert LeChevalier, 2002 Dec 31
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 31
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 31
• Re: a gadri which will solve all our box/doctor/unicorn-wanting problems (was Re: [jboske] Needed boxes) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 31
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Invent Yourself, 2002 Dec 31
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Jorge Llambias, 2002 Dec 31
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 01
• Re: a gadri which will solve all our box/doctor/unicorn-wanting problems (was Re: [jboske] Needed boxes) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 01
• Re: a gadri which will solve all our box/doctor/unicorn-wanting problems (was Re: [jboske] Needed boxes) —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 01
• RE: Re: [jboske] Digest Number 136 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 02
• Re: Re: [jboske] propositionalism redux —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 02
• Fwd: Re: [jboske] lo'e: Solomontean capitulation: resend —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 03
• RE: [jboske] RE: fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm:2 excellent proposals —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 03
• RE: Re: [jboske] propositionalism redux —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 03
• interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 03
• RE: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 03
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 03
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 03
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 03
• Re: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 04
• Doing logic in Lojban —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 04
• gadri —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 04
• Re: [jboske] gadri —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 04
• Re: [jboske] Doing logic in Lojban —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 04
• Re: [jboske] gadri —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 04
• Re: [jboske] gadri —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] Doing logic in Lojban —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] gadri —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] gadri —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] propositionalism redux —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 04
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 05
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 05
• da'a —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 05
• Hello over there —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 05
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 05
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 05
• Re: [jboske] da'a —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 05
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 05
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 05
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 05
• Kinds —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 05
• {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 05
• Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: Kinds —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
• Intensions: W —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] Hello over there —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] Re: Kinds —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] Intensions: W —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] da'a —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] da'a —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: Kinds —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Intensions: W —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: Kinds —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] Intensions: W —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 06
• Monty's unicorns —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Intensions: W —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• Q lo'e —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Hello over there —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Intensions: W —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
• SL & the 2nd Excellent Solution —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] interpretation of LAhE (was: RE: Digest Number 136 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Intensions: W —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 06
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 06
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 07
• moratorium on SL debates (was: RE: interpretation of LAhE —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 07
• "I want some xodium" —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 07
• Re: [jboske] da'a —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 07
• Re: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 07
• Re: [jboske] Intensions: W —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 07
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 07
• Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 07
• erratum —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 07
• Re: [jboske] Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 07
• metric prefixes —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 07
• RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 07
• RE: [jboske] Hello over there —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 08
• 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Hello over there —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• More from pc Re: [jboske] Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
• pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and a couple other issues —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: More from pc Re: [jboske] Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and a couple other issues —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 08
• Ontology #1 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Hello over there —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and a couple other issues —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Hello over there —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• lo/le definition —Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Hello over there —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and acouple other issues —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] lo/le definition —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] lo/le definition —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] pc's comments on Nick's: "Monty's Unicorns, Fermat version", and acouple other issues —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Hello over there —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] lo/le definition —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] lo/le definition —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
• Re: [jboske] Ontology #1 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Ontology #1 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] lo/le definition —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] lo/le definition —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 08
• RE: [jboske] Ontology #1 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 09
• What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] Ontology #1 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: Ontology #1 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] Ontology #1 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 09
• Subject: RE: lo/le definition —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 09
• Ontology #2 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] Subject: RE: lo/le definition —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol) —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] Subject: RE: lo/le definition —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol) —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 09
• The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 09
• The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 09
• RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] Ontology #2 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 09
• Retract Ontology #2 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 09
• Re: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 10
• ExSol ver 4.0 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• Aristotelian vs. modern logic —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• talking about 2 —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• Kinds —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] Subject: RE: lo/le definition —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] Kinds —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 10
• Lojban is fxxxed —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] talking about 2 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 10
• Ontology #3 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 10
• Excellent Solutions —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• Status of names —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• po'o —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• Re: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 10
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 10
• Eating individuals —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• alleged ambiguity of lo —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• twentysomething —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• Re: [jboske] Ontology #1 —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• Re: [jboske] lo/le definition —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 10
• Re: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• Re: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 10
• Re: [jboske] Ontology #3 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 10
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 10
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] Status of names —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] Ontology #3 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 10
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] lo/le definition —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Ontology #3 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group, 2003 Jan 11
• And-Kind —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
• Transfinites —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] RE: Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] And-Kind —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] lo/le definition —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 11
• The un-common-sensical-ness of non-importing ro —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 11
• Kludgesome Solution #1 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
• intuitive zi'o and middle voice —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] RE: Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] lo/le definition —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] The un-common-sensical-ness of non-importing ro —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] RE: Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 11
• OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] Transfinites —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] Kludgesome Solution #1 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: [jboske] ExSol ver 4.0 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• Fermat propositionalism (was: RE: Transfinites —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 11
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 11
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Kludgesome Solution #1 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Ontology #3 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• Subject:  RE: [jboske] Transfinites —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• Emergence solved —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Transfinites —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Kludgesome Solution #1 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Ontology #3 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Transfinites —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: [jboske] Emergence solved —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 12
• Heh —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• Oops —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: [jboske] Heh —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 12
• Well, might as well burn the bridge now —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: [jboske] Transfinites —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 12
• RE: Subject:  RE: [jboske] Transfinites —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 12
• The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 12
• Substance vs Bit of Substance —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: [jboske] Emergence solved —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: [jboske] Substance vs Bit of Substance —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: Substance vs Bit of Substance —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: Emergence solved —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 12
• The mess, the despair, and the Lojban Academy —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• XS 4.1: the gist —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism&c —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Emergence solved —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] po'o —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] ExSol ver 4.0 —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] XS 4.1: the gist —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Substance vs Bit of Substance —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Re: Substance vs Bit of Substance —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Transfinites —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• ellipsis (was: RE: The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The un-common-sensical-ness of non-importing ro —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Counting Nick —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• KS1.1: piro —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
• Link on (Intensional) Masses —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: Counting Nick —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: Transfinites —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Well, might as well burn the bridge now —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Link on (Intensional) Masses —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Re: Counting Nick —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: Link on (Intensional) Masses —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: Counting Nick —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
• Link on (Intensional) Masses —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 13
• KS 1.1: piro —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 13
• KS 1.1: piro —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 13
• Apologies for repeats just then. —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] lo/le definition —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] KS1.1: piro —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] KS1.1: piro —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• An Amateur note on Substance (was: Transfinites) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• zi'o (was: Transfinites) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Re: Counting Nick —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] lo/le definition —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Re: Counting Nick —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] RE: What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] RE: What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 13
• forests of worlds (was: RE: OT: verification principle —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Re: Link on (Intensional) Masses —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• TOTALLY OT: philosophy & yawning (was: RE: Lojban is fxxxed —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol) —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] KS 1.1: piro —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] XS 4.1: the gist —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Re: Counting Nick —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] forests of worlds (was: RE: OT: verification principle —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Re: Link on (Intensional) Masses —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] 3rd version of gadri system (3rd ExSol) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Re: Transfinites —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: Re: Link on (Intensional) Masses —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] An Amateur note on Substance (was: Transfinites) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Re: Link on (Intensional) Masses —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] lo/le definition —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] Transfinites —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] An Amateur note on Substance (was: Transfinites) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] lo/le definition —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 13
• RE: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 14
• OT: Quine; Cantor (was Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Transfinites —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 14
• wonderful news: ellipsis, zo'e, zi'o (was: RE: Transfinites —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] Transfinites —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] An Amateur note on Substance (was: Transfinites) —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• pimu of real numbers? —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] pimu of real numbers? —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• Mr Ma'u —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] pimu of real numbers? —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] An Amateur note on Substance (was: Transfinites) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] factivity of nu —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] RE: What is a lojbanmass? Quantification —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] Transfinites —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] wonderful news: ellipsis, zo'e, zi'o (was: RE: Transfinites —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] factivity of nu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 160 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] Re: Counting Nick —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 160 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• The compromise of uncomprehension —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] The compromise of uncomprehension —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] The compromise of uncomprehension —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] The compromise of uncomprehension —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: OT: Quine; Cantor (was Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: Counting Nick —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 160 —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• zi'o blanu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] zi'o blanu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 160 —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] pimu of real numbers? —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] zi'o blanu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] zi'o blanu —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] zi'o blanu —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Gonna read a thesis —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Mr Ma'u —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] Re: Counting Nick —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• Quantifiers and lo/loi —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Mr Ma'u —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] Mr Ma'u —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] Mr Ma'u —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] Quantifiers and lo/loi —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 14
• RE: [jboske] Quantifiers and lo/loi —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: OT: Quine; Cantor (was Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: OT: Quine; Cantor (was Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 15
• RE: [jboske] Quantifiers and lo/loi —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: OT: Quine; Cantor (was Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 15
• New Ontology —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 15
• KS Kinds —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: [jboske] New Ontology —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 15
• loi includes Kind —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: [jboske] New Ontology —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: [jboske] loi includes Kind —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: OT: Quine; Cantor (was Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: OT: Quine; Cantor (was Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: [jboske] loi includes Kind —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: [jboske] KS Kinds —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 15
• RE: [jboske] KS Kinds —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 15
• RE: [jboske] KS Kinds —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 15
• RE: [jboske] KS Kinds —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 15
• RE: [jboske] KS Kinds —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 15
• Re: loi includes Kind —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 16
• Re: loi includes Kind —Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@hidden.email>, 2003 Jan 16
• RE: [jboske] Re: loi includes Kind —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 16
• Opacity and belief —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 17
• RE: [jboske] Opacity and belief —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 17
• Fwd: Re: [jboske] Opacity and belief —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jan 18
• RE: [jboske] Opacity and belief —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 18
• alternative to sedu'u —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 18
• Re: [jboske] Opacity and belief —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 18
• RE: [jboske] Opacity and belief —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 19
• Re: [jboske] Opacity and belief —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 19
• Ralph vs. the Tortoise —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 19
• RE: [jboske] Opacity and belief —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 20
• Re: [jboske] Ralph vs. the Tortoise —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Jan 21
• Re: [jboske] Opacity and belief —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 21
• Re: [jboske] Opacity and belief —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 21
• Re: [jboske] Opacity and belief —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 21
• RE: [jboske] Opacity and belief —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 22
• Re: [jboske] Opacity and belief —John Cowan, 2003 Jan 22
• RE: [jboske] Opacity and belief —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 22
• Re: [jboske] Opacity and belief —Edward Cherlin, 2003 Jan 27
• RE: [jboske] Opacity and belief —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 27
• RE: [jboske] Opacity and belief —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 27
• RE: [jboske] Opacity and belief —And Rosta, 2003 Jan 27
• the new non-mathematical sets —Jorge Llambias, 2003 Feb 09
• RE: [lojban] Nick will be with you shortly —And Rosta, 2003 Feb 26
• 4 solutions to collective/substance —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Apr 08
• Re: [jboske] 4 solutions to collective/substance —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Apr 08
• Re: [jboske] 4 solutions to collective/substance —Llamb�as, 2003 Apr 08
• long-distance vo'a —John Cowan, 2003 Apr 16
• Re: [jboske] long-distance vo'a —Llamb�as, 2003 Apr 16
• grammar & pseudogrammar —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 29
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Apr 29
• RE: [ lojban.org ] - New Post - Salvo 1: 27 April —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 29
• RE: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 29
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —John Cowan, 2003 Apr 29
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Apr 29
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 29
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 29
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Apr 29
• RE: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —John Cowan, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —John Cowan, 2003 Apr 30
• [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb —John Cowan, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [ lojban.org ] - New Post - what it takes to be a UI: {kau} —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Apr 30
• [jboske] Proposed selma'o KAU? —John Cowan, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Llamb�as, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —Llamb�as, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] Proposed selma'o KAU? —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] Proposed selma'o KAU? —Llamb�as, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Llamb�as, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: grammar & pseudogrammar —jjllambias2000, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] Proposed selma'o KAU? —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] Proposed selma'o KAU? —John Cowan, 2003 Apr 30
• RE: [jboske] Proposed selma'o KAU? —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 30
• RE: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 30
• Re: [jboske] Proposed selma'o KAU? —Invent Yourself, 2003 Apr 30
• RE: [jboske] Re: [ lojban.org ] - New Post - what it takes to be a UI: {kau} —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 30
• RE: [jboske] Re: grammar & pseudogrammar —And Rosta, 2003 Apr 30
• RE: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Llamb�as, 2003 Apr 30
• RE: [jboske] Re: grammar & pseudogrammar —Llamb�as, 2003 May 01
• RE: [jboske] Re: grammar & pseudogrammar —And Rosta, 2003 May 01
• RE: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —And Rosta, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 01
• Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Llamb�as, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 01
• Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —Llamb�as, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —And Rosta, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] grammar & pseudogrammar —Llamb�as, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —Llamb�as, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —John Cowan, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —Llamb�as, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 May 01
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —Llamb�as, 2003 May 01
• Some ideas/questions (long) —oskar2379, 2003 May 04
• RE: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) —And Rosta, 2003 May 05
• rafsi fu'ivla —Pierre Abbat, 2003 May 09
• Re: [jboske] rafsi fu'ivla —Llamb�as, 2003 May 10
• Re: [jboske] rafsi fu'ivla —Pierre Abbat, 2003 May 10
• Re: [jboske] rafsi fu'ivla —Llamb�as, 2003 May 10
• Re: [jboske] rafsi fu'ivla —Pierre Abbat, 2003 May 10
• TEI, FOI and multiple-diacritic characters —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 May 11
• Re: TEI, FOI and multiple-diacritic characters —Nick Nicholas, 2003 May 11
• "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —And Rosta, 2003 May 29
• Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —John Cowan, 2003 May 29
• RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —And Rosta, 2003 May 29
• RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —Invent Yourself, 2003 May 29
• Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —John Cowan, 2003 May 29
• Re: [lojban] Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —John Cowan, 2003 May 29
• RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi —And Rosta, 2003 May 31
• events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 31
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 May 31
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 31
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 May 31
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 May 31
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 May 31
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 01
• RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
• RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
• RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what weneed (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was:RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
• RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what weneed (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was:RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
• RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jun 01
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 01
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 01
• [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
• Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 01
• Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 01
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 01
• Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 01
• Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 01
• Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 01
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
• RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 01
• Re: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 02
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 02
• Too far. (was: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 196 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what weneed (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what weneed (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 02
• lo = da poi? Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re:"x1 is a Y for doing x2" —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 196 —Llamb�as, 2003 Jun 02
• SW —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jun 02
• lo'e, na'o —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
• RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what weneed (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was:RE: taksi)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jun 02
• RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do whatweneed (was Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re:antiblotation(was:RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 02
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] lo = da poi? Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re:"x1 is a Y for doing x2" —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 02
• Re: [jboske] SW —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 02
• RE: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] Digest Number 196 —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] RE: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi)) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
• F33r the Corpus (was: Digest Number 196) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] lo = da poi? Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re:"x1 is a Y for doing x2" —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
• ga'omi'i —Pierre Abbat, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] F33r the Corpus (was: Digest Number 196) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 03
• Re: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 03
• Re: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.) —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jun 03
• upcoming gadri war (was: RE: Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 03
• Re: [jboske] upcoming gadri war (was: RE: Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jun 04
• Re: [jboske] upcoming gadri war (was: RE: Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.) —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jun 04
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.) —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Jun 04
• Re: [jboske] lo = da poi? Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re:"x1 is a Y for doing x2" —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 04
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —Robert LeChevalier, 2003 Jun 04
• Re: [jboske] upcoming gadri war (was: RE: Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 04
• Re: [jboske] lo = da poi? Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don'tdo what we need (was Re:"x1 is a Y for doing x2" —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 04
• Re: [jboske] lo = da poi? Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don'tdo what we need (was Re:"x1 is a Y for doing x2" —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 04
• Re: [jboske] lo = da poi? Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadridon'tdo what we need (was Re:"x1 is a Y for doing x2" —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 04
• CHAT: damascene Nick (was: RE: Sapir-Whorf sucks (etc.) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 04
• RE: [jboske] Sapir-Whorf sucks, and other nonjboske-ish things (was Re: events which don't exist do, because our gadri don't do what we need (was Re: "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi))) —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 04
• ra, ru [Jordan: please read] —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 18
• Re: [jboske] ra, ru [Jordan: please read] —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 18
• Re: [jboske] ra, ru [Jordan: please read] —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 18
• "Have you got five quid"? -- the goatleg rule —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 18
• Re: [jboske] ra, ru [Jordan: please read] —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 19
• Re: [jboske] ra, ru [Jordan: please read] —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 19
• Re: [jboske] ra, ru [Jordan: please read] —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 19
• Re: [jboske] ra, ru [Jordan: please read] —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jun 19
• Re: [jboske] ra, ru [Jordan: please read] —Llamb�as, 2003 Jun 19
• OT:email client recommendation —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 19
• Re: [jboske] OT:email client recommendation —John Cowan, 2003 Jun 19
• Re: [jboske] ra, ru [Jordan: please read] —And Rosta, 2003 Jun 19
• Some comments on tags —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 16
• Re: [lojban] use of ko'a (was: Re: Re: describing people —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 18
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] use of ko'a (was: Re: Re: describing people —John Cowan, 2003 Jul 18
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] use of ko'a (was: Re: Re: describing people —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 18
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] use of ko'a (was: Re: Re: describing people —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 18
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] use of ko'a (was: Re: Re: describing people —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 18
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] use of ko'a (was: Re: Re: describing people —Pierre Abbat, 2003 Jul 18
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] use of ko'a (was: Re: Re: describing people —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 18
• cu & ja'a —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 20
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —John Cowan, 2003 Jul 20
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [lojban] Re: use of ko'a —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —John Cowan, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: use of ko'a —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —John Cowan, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Jul 21
• Re: [jboske] cu & ja'a —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 21
• GOhA - bapu —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 21
• ntc etc. —Pierre Abbat, 2003 Jul 22
• * broda na brode —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 26
• "What is Lojban" book published —John Cowan, 2003 Jul 28
• Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 29
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Jul 29
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 29
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Pierre Abbat, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —And Rosta, 2003 Jul 30
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 31
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 31
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Jul 31
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Llamb�as, 2003 Jul 31
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 01
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 01
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 01
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 01
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 01
• usage of lo'e —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 01
• Re: [jboske] Gadri for you —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 01
• essentials of a gadri system —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 02
• gadri designs —MorphemeAddict, 2003 Aug 02
• Re: [jboske] gadri designs —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 03
• Re: essentials of a gadri system —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 03
• Re: Gadri for you —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 03
• Syntactic unambiguity —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Aug 03
• Re: [jboske] Re: Gadri for you —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 03
• Re: [jboske] Syntactic unambiguity —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 03
• Re: [jboske] essentials of a gadri system —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 03
• Re: [jboske] Syntactic unambiguity —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Aug 03
• Re: [jboske] Syntactic unambiguity —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 03
• Re: [jboske] Re: essentials of a gadri system —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 03
• Re: [jboske] Re: essentials of a gadri system —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] essentials of a gadri system —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Re: essentials of a gadri system —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Re: essentials of a gadri system —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Re: essentials of a gadri system —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Re: essentials of a gadri system —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Re: essentials of a gadri system —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• CLL lo'e broda is lo jai ka broda (was: Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] CLL lo'e broda is lo jai ka broda (was: Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system)) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] CLL lo'e broda is lo jai ka broda (was: Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system)) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: No static, democratic —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Re: No static, democratic —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadrisystem) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Re: essentials of a gadri system —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadrisystem) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Intension = lo'e'e Extension —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] Intension = lo'e'e Extension —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 04
• Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: No static, democratic —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: essentials of a gadri system —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 05
• LAhE and quantifiers —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Just to be sure —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
• LAhE = lo broda be ? —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Just to be sure —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] LAhE = lo broda be ? —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] LAhE = lo broda be ? —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Just to be sure —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] LAhE = lo broda be ? —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• Re: [jboske] Just to be sure —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 05
• some oddly relevant song lyrics —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Aug 06
• three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —seqram2, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —Pierre Abbat, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 06
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• James Cooke Brown speaks! —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] James Cooke Brown speaks! —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] LAhE = lo broda be ? —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] James Cooke Brown speaks! —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 07
• [opoudjis@hidden.email: Re: James Cooke Brown speaks!] —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] LAhE = lo broda be ? —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] LAhE = lo broda be ? —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 07
• Mr. Intension —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 07
• Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 07
• a minimalist fantasy —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 07
• Mr. Bird and other carnivores —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —Pierre Abbat, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] a minimalist fantasy —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 07
• Re: [jboske] a minimalist fantasy —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Chasing Any (was: Digest Number 217) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Chasing Any (was: Digest Number 217) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird, negation, and *ivorousness —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Chasing Any (was: Digest Number 217) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• xorxes's simple solution (was: Re: a minimalist fantasy —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Intension —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —Pierre Abbat, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Chasing Any (was: Digest Number 217) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] xorxes's simple solution (was: Re: a minimalist fantasy —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] xorxes's simple solution (was: Re: a minimalist fantasy —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] LAhE and quantifiers —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —Pierre Abbat, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• preparing for BF (was: Re: xorxes's simple solution (was: Re: a minimalist fantasy —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] preparing for BF (was: Re: xorxes's simple solution (was: Re: a minimalist fantasy —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 08
• pa vs tu'o —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] preparing for BF (was: Re: xorxes's simple solution (was: Re: a minimalist fantasy —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system) —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• tense and atemporality —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] preparing for BF (was: Re: xorxes's simple solution (was: Re: a minimalist fantasy —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] tense and atemporality —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• Re: [jboske] Digest Number 217 —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 08
• torch —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 09
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 09
• Re: [jboske] tense and atemporality —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Aug 09
• Re: [jboske] torch —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 09
• the one and only - counting and Uniques —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 09
• Re: [jboske] torch —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Aug 09
• Re: [jboske] tense and atemporality —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 09
• Do we count? (was: Digest Number 217) —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 09
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 09
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 09
• Re: [jboske] torch —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 10
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] tense and atemporality —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] the one and only - counting and Uniques —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] the one and only - counting and Uniques —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] lo'e cinfo and lo'e -antelope —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Mr. Bird and other carnivores —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] tense and atemporality —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Do we count? (was: Digest Number 217) —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] the one and only - counting and Uniques —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 11
• loi/lo'e/lo as Kind —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 11
• Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 11
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —seqram2, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Aug 12
• i yield —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Re: Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 12
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 13
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 13
• Re: [jboske] Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 13
• Re: [jboske] i yield —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 13
• Re: i yield —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 13
• Re: [jboske] Re: i yield —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 13
• Re: [jboske] Re: i yield —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 13
• Where is the current, official machine grammar? —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Aug 13
• Re: [jboske] Where is the current, official machine grammar? —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 13
• Re: [jboske] Re: i yield —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 13
• Re: [jboske] Re: i yield —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 13
• points of agreement so far —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 13
• tu'o: we've already been there —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Aug 13
• Re: [jboske] tu'o: we've already been there —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 14
• Re: [jboske] tu'o: we've already been there —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 14
• Re: tu'o: we've already been there —seqram2, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Re: tu'o: we've already been there —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 15
• Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Re: tu'o: we've already been there —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: tu'o: we've already been there —seqram2, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —seqram2, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Re: Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Re: Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 15
• Re: [jboske] Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 16
• Re: [jboske] Re: tu'o: we've already been there —John Cowan, 2003 Aug 16
• Re: [jboske] Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 16
• ma tcini —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 26
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 26
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 26
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 26
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 26
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 27
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 27
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 27
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 28
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —Invent Yourself, 2003 Aug 28
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 28
• Re: [jboske] ma tcini —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 28
• tags as connectives —Llamb�as, 2003 Aug 28
• LAhE, ME & XS —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 31
• lVi & xod-collectives —And Rosta, 2003 Aug 31
• Re: [jboske] LAhE, ME & XS —Llamb�as, 2003 Sep 01
• Re: [jboske] lVi & xod-collectives —Llamb�as, 2003 Sep 01
• extending XS to other gadri —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 01
• Re: [jboske] LAhE, ME & XS —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 01
• Re: [jboske] lVi & xod-collectives —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 01
• Re: [jboske] lVi & xod-collectives —Llamb�as, 2003 Sep 01
• Re: [jboske] lVi & xod-collectives —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 02
• Re: [jboske] extending XS to other gadri —John Cowan, 2003 Sep 05
• Re: [jboske] extending XS to other gadri —Invent Yourself, 2003 Sep 05
• Re: [jboske] extending XS to other gadri —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 06
• Re: [jboske] extending XS to other gadri —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 06
• Canonical Quine literature? —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Sep 11
• Re: [jboske] Canonical Quine literature? —John Cowan, 2003 Sep 11
• sumti grammar oddity —Llamb�as, 2003 Sep 11
• Re: [jboske] sumti grammar oddity —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Sep 11
• Re: [jboske] sumti grammar oddity —Llamb�as, 2003 Sep 11
• Re: [jboske] sumti grammar oddity —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 12
• Re: [jboske] sumti grammar oddity —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Sep 12
• BF (was: Re: sumti grammar oddity —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 12
• Re: [jboske] sumti grammar oddity —Llamb�as, 2003 Sep 12
• Re: [jboske] sumti grammar oddity —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Sep 12
• Re: [jboske] BF (was: Re: sumti grammar oddity —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Sep 12
• Re: [jboske] BF (was: Re: sumti grammar oddity —Invent Yourself, 2003 Sep 12
• Re: [jboske] BF (was: Re: sumti grammar oddity —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 13
• BF definitions —Llamb�as, 2003 Sep 14
• Re: [jboske] sumti grammar oddity —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 14
• Re: [jboske] BF definitions —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Sep 15
• Re: [jboske] BF definitions —Llamb�as, 2003 Sep 16
• Re: [jboske] BF definitions —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Sep 16
• [no subject] —Nick Nicholas, 2003 Sep 16
• Re: [jboske] —John Cowan, 2003 Sep 16
• Re: [jboske] BF definitions —Llamb�as, 2003 Sep 16
• Re: [jboske] sumti grammar oddity —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Sep 21
• Bob on BF (was: Re: sumti grammar oddity —And Rosta, 2003 Sep 25
• mail to nntp gateway —Adam Raizen, 2003 Sep 29
• mu'ei, fau, va'i —And Rosta, 2003 Oct 02
• Re: [jboske] mu'ei, fau, va'i —Llamb�as, 2003 Oct 02
• Re: [jboske] mu'ei, fau, va'i —And Rosta, 2003 Oct 03
• Re: [jboske] mu'ei, fau, va'i —Llamb�as, 2003 Oct 03
• Re: [jboske] mu'ei, fau, va'i —And Rosta, 2003 Oct 03
• The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Oct 15
• Re: [jboske] The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality —Llamb�as, 2003 Oct 15
• Re: [jboske] The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Oct 15
• Re: [jboske] The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality —Invent Yourself, 2003 Oct 15
• Re: [jboske] The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality —Llamb�as, 2003 Oct 15
• Re: [jboske] The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality —John Cowan, 2003 Oct 15
• Re: [jboske] The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality —Invent Yourself, 2003 Oct 15
• speni —MorphemeAddict, 2003 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality —Bob LeChevalier, 2003 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality —Llamb�as, 2003 Oct 16
• Re: [lojban] Re: Tenses (was: Re: consolation) —Martin Bays, 2003 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: Tenses (was: Re: consolation) —Llamb�as, 2003 Oct 16
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: Tenses (was: Re: consolation) —Martin Bays, 2003 Oct 17
• Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] Re: Tenses (was: Re: consolation) —Llamb�as, 2003 Oct 20
• Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: [WikiChanges] BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Nov 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: [WikiChanges] BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo —John Cowan, 2003 Nov 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: [WikiChanges] BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo —Llamb�as, 2003 Nov 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: [WikiChanges] BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo —Llamb�as, 2003 Nov 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: [WikiChanges] BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo —Jordan DeLong, 2003 Nov 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: [WikiChanges] BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo —Llamb�as, 2003 Nov 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: [WikiChanges] BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2003 Nov 14
• Re: [jboske] Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: [WikiChanges] BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo —John Cowan, 2003 Nov 14
• bu, zo —And Rosta, 2003 Nov 17
• Re: [jboske] bu, zo —John Cowan, 2003 Nov 17
• Re: [jboske] bu, zo —Llamb�as, 2003 Nov 17
• Test, please ignore —cowan, 2003 Dec 01
• Re: [jboske] Test, please ignore —Llamb�as, 2003 Dec 01
• Re: [jboske] Test, please ignore —Invent Yourself, 2003 Dec 01
• Re: [jboske] Test, please ignore —John Cowan, 2003 Dec 02
• Re: [jboske] Test, please ignore —Llamb�as, 2003 Dec 02
• wiki fault? —And Rosta, 2004 Feb 11
• Re: [jboske] wiki fault? —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2004 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] wiki fault? —Llamb�as, 2004 Feb 12
• Re: [jboske] wiki fault? —Llamb�as, 2004 Feb 12
• Quantification of quoted text (was Re: BPFK Section: gadri) —Jordan DeLong, 2004 Jun 11
• Re: [jboske] Quantification of quoted text (was Re: BPFK Section: gadri) —Llamb�as, 2004 Jun 11
• Re: [jboske] Quantification of quoted text (was Re: BPFK Section: gadri) —Jordan DeLong, 2004 Jun 11
• Considering creating a link grammar for Lojban —bgoertzel, 2005 Feb 20
• Re: [jboske] Considering creating a link grammar for Lojban —Llamb�as, 2005 Feb 20
• Re: [llg-members] ko sidju la by py fy ky —Robin Lee Powell, 2006 Jan 19
• Re: [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definitions —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 15
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —pycyn, 2006 Sep 16
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 18
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 19
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 19
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 19
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 19
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 20
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 20
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 20
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 20
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 21
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 21
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 21
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 22
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 22
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 22
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 22
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 23
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 23
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 23
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 23
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 25
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 25
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 25
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 26
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 26
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 26
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 26
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 26
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 27
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 27
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 27
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 27
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 27
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 28
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 28
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 28
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 28
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 29
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 29
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 29
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Sep 29
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Sep 30
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 02
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 03
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 03
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 04
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 04
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 04
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 05
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 05
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 06
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 06
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 06
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 10
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 10
• Re: [jboske] [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Oct 10
• [WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition —John E. Clifford, 2006 Oct 11
• Space necessity —Hugh O'Byrne, 2006 Nov 12
• Re: [jboske] Space necessity —Jorge Llambías, 2006 Nov 12
• Scope of da'i in counterfactual implications —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2007 Mar 26
• Re: [jboske] Scope of da'i in counterfactual implications —Jorge Llambías, 2007 Mar 26
• Re: [jboske] Scope of da'i in counterfactual implications —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2007 Mar 31
• Re: [jboske] Scope of da'i in counterfactual implications —Jorge Llambías, 2007 Mar 31
• ROI, quantification, and xorlo —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2007 Apr 10
• Re: [jboske] ROI, quantification, and xorlo —Jorge Llambías, 2007 Apr 10
• Re: [jboske] ROI, quantification, and xorlo —Arnt Richard Johansen, 2007 Apr 11
• Re: [jboske] ROI, quantification, and xorlo —Jorge Llambías, 2007 Apr 11
• the use of tu'a with sisku —Matt, 2007 Jun 12
• Re: [jboske] the use of tu'a with sisku —Jorge Llambías, 2007 Jun 13
• Engelang & Jboske despamulated —And Rosta, 2007 Sep 28
• thesaurus? —james, 2012 Jan 21
• LoCCan3 development ideas. —gleki.arxokuna, 2012 Jul 31
• Re: [jboske] LoCCan3 development ideas. —And Rosta, 2012 Aug 02
• Re: [engelang] Re: [jboske] LoCCan3 development ideas. —Jorge Llambías, 2012 Aug 03
• Re: LoCCan3 development ideas. —gleki.arxokuna, 2012 Aug 08
• Re: [engelang] Re: [jboske] LoCCan3 development ideas. —And Rosta, 2012 Aug 15
• Re: [engelang] Re: [jboske] LoCCan3 development ideas. —Jorge Llambías, 2012 Aug 15
• Re: [engelang] Re: [jboske] LoCCan3 development ideas. —And Rosta, 2012 Aug 16
• Re: [engelang] Re: [jboske] LoCCan3 development ideas. —And Rosta, 2012 Aug 16
• Re: [engelang] Re: [jboske] LoCCan3 development ideas. —Jorge Llambías, 2012 Aug 16
• Engelang or Jboske? —Mike S., 2012 Aug 21
• Re: [engelang] Engelang or Jboske? —John Cowan, 2012 Aug 21
• Re: [engelang] Engelang or Jboske? —And Rosta, 2012 Aug 21
• Re: [engelang] Engelang or Jboske? —John Cowan, 2012 Aug 21
• Re: [engelang] Engelang or Jboske? —Mike S., 2012 Aug 21
• Re: [jboske] Re: [engelang] Engelang or Jboske? —And Rosta, 2012 Aug 23
• Re: [jboske] Re: LoCCan3 development ideas. —And Rosta, 2012 Aug 26