[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] Collective: definition



On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 11:00:46AM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 09:46:48PM +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> > > (resend)
> >
> > didn't get the first...hrm
> >
> > [...]
> > > Similarly, you can say
> > >
> > > mi citka pi ro loi rismi
> > >
> > > and mean half now and half later. Bzzt, your collective instantly
> > > evaporates. you've split the rice in two, you're not eating it all
> > > together at the same time.
> >
> > Ok, you had me till here.  I think this is bogus.
> 
> I think so too. Nick has forgotten what a collective is. In summary, it
> exists to refer to properties that do NOT exist by the individuals.

But lojbanmasses already do that.

> First, I refer you both to
> http://www.thestonecutters.net/xod/lojban/jboske.html

Your definition of collective is a lot less clear than the definition
of lojbanmass in the book.

> Next, assume that 2 men cannot carry the piano.

Heh.  Ok, but if 3 men are carrying the piano together, each of
them individually *is* carrying some amount of the weight of the
piano.

So I don't see what you are trying to get at.

> Any questions?

-- 
Jordan DeLong - fracture@hidden.email
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

Attachment: bin1vNrLqMmMZ.bin
Description: application/ygp-stripped