[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Xod: > Naturally, I find the fact that there are no natlang analogs to xoi'a and > xoi'e (especially with respect to a direct treatment of "linear" and > "exponential" functions) a very Good Thing. But for something that needn't be expressed by a cmavo but could be expressed by a lujvo instead, isn't the evidence of natlangs useful in suggesting which concepts are needed often enough to warrant being expressed by a cmavo? But I agree that the meanings in question are interesting to investigate. --And.