[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
But the same could be said of na & ja'a -- it would be handy to be
able to put them adjacent to the focused element too.
And logically, xu pretty much is a WH version of ja'a.
So really, xu should be in JAhA, and Lojban should have a better
general-purpose way of handling focus.
-And.
>>> cowan@hidden.email 04/30/03 12:07pm >>>
And Rosta scripsit:
> Which reminds me, {xu} is another word that doesn't really rightly belong
> in UI. I'd put it in JAhA instead (or is it NA?).
Allowing xu to be put after anything is handy for focussing.
> That said, I think that tidying up the grammar falls outside the scope of
> the BF. The BF is supposed to complete rather than titivate, and to
> fix only what is broken rather than what is merely shoddy.
Amen!
--
What is the sound of Perl? Is it not the John Cowan
sound of a [Ww]all that people have stopped jcowan@hidden.email
banging their head against? --Larry http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
jboske-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/