[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] Gadri for you



--- Invent Yourself <xod@hidden.email> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Jorge Llamb�as wrote:
> > Similarly,
> >    ko'a fa'u ko'e broda ko'i fa'u ko'o
> > would correspond to
> >    le'au brode cu broda le'au brodi
> 
> Ah! Like le'i, only an ordered tuple. Nice.

{le'i re broda} corresponds to {ko'a ce ko'e}.
An ordered tuple, say {le'i'o re broda} would 
correspond to {ko'a ce'o ko'e}. That's the one Pierre
mentioned.

The one I mentioned, {le'au re broda} corresponds to 
{ko'a fa'u ko'e}, not to {ko'a ce'o ko'e}. It means something
like "the two brodas respectively", it has to pair up with 
some other fa'u/le'au to make sense.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com