[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Jorge Llambías wrote:
>
> --- Invent Yourself <xod@hidden.email> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> > > Similarly,
> > > ko'a fa'u ko'e broda ko'i fa'u ko'o
> > > would correspond to
> > > le'au brode cu broda le'au brodi
> >
> > Ah! Like le'i, only an ordered tuple. Nice.
>
> {le'i re broda} corresponds to {ko'a ce ko'e}.
> An ordered tuple, say {le'i'o re broda} would
> correspond to {ko'a ce'o ko'e}. That's the one Pierre
> mentioned.
>
> The one I mentioned, {le'au re broda} corresponds to
> {ko'a fa'u ko'e}, not to {ko'a ce'o ko'e}. It means something
> like "the two brodas respectively", it has to pair up with
> some other fa'u/le'au to make sense.
pe'i
la'e lu ko'a ce'o ko'e broda ko'i ce'o ko'o li'u
cu smuni
la'e lu ko'a fa'u ko'e broda ko'i fa'u ko'o li'u
--
The Pentagon group believed it had a visionary strategy that would
transform Iraq into an ally of Israel, remove a potential threat to the
Persian Gulf oil trade and encircle Iran with U.S. friends and allies...