[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] carving the lo'e debate into shape (was: RE: My last will and




la djan cusku di'e

> Are you saying it is not, but rather that {lu'a} is something
> that buries quantifiers, like {tu'a} or {lo'ei}? That would be
> a new ingredient to play with.

Yes, I think that LAhE does bury quantifiers.

I don't mean the quantifiers inside of LAhE. Are you saying
the default quantifier of all LAhEs is {tu'o}? That would be
good. In fact, {tu'o} should be the default quantifier of
every gadri, which would make things much, much simpler. You
would only use a quantifier when you want/need to.

mu'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________
Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp