[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
And Rosta scripsit:
> If x2 is nu, then what you need is for x2 to be actual. If
> x2 is du'u, then what you need is for x2 to be true.
Quite so.
> The x2 can't
> be defined as "nu or du'u", but it could be defined as "nu" or
> defined as "du'u".
Why not "nu or du'u"? If a nu is found (or equivalent such as le fasnu)
then the "actual" interpretation; if a du'u is found (or equivalent such as
le se jufra) then the "true" interpretation.
--
John Cowan jcowan@hidden.email www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com
"In computer science, we stand on each other's feet."
--Brian K. Reid