[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] ni/jei (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka



On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 05:19:05PM -0000, And Rosta wrote:
> Jordan:
[...]
> > Note btw, that because of x2 of ni, we can even use ni to do "leni
> > gerku" for "the number of dogs" 
> 
> I still can't see "Three is the extent to which there is a dog"
> making sense. I can make sense of measuring the extent to which
> there is a dog by counting how many dogs there are, but the
> extent still seems to me to be the amount that the world has to
> change to switch the truth value. 

leni gerku kei be lesi'o zilkancu le'i gerku

> What I am saying is that I can see only one scale that makes sense
> of ni, but I can see many different ways of calibrating it. If
> x2 does the calibration, then I am not bemused.

I don't understand why.  I think a different scale is needed for more
or less every usage.

-- 
Jordan DeLong - fracture@hidden.email
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

Attachment: bincVpSXNpHPW.bin
Description: application/ygp-stripped