[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 07:43:07PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 07:24:29PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > > On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:27:35PM -0000, And Rosta wrote:
> > > > > Jordan:
> > > > > > {me la xod} still doesn't work for what xod wants, anyway, afaict
> > > > >
> > > > > Would {ka ce'u me la xod}? I think it would.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think so. He wants to replace kau with this, remember.
> > >
> > > ka ce'u me la xod works fine. I don't want to replace every use of makau
> > > with this, only in those cases where it's being used to hack an identity
> > > abstractor.
> > [...]
> >
> > Could you be so kind as to paraphrase at least *one* du'u makau in
> > terms of this? I still don't see how this works.
>
> le su'u ce'u catra la lauras. kei be lo kamse'i cu slabu mi to
> .iseni'inaibo le catra cu slabu mi toi
Errr.... You didn't even use it though. I meant in terms of the
"ka ce'u me la xod" thing.
(Btw, you can't put a I stag BO right inside of a to...toi like
that. "broda .ibo brode" is a single sentence---you can't just
have half of it. To do that properly you need ku instead of bo).
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@hidden.email
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
binUTU_Ipn58o.bin
Description: application/ygp-stripped