[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 07:43:07PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 07:24:29PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:27:35PM -0000, And Rosta wrote:
> > > > > > Jordan:
> > > > > > > {me la xod} still doesn't work for what xod wants, anyway, afaict
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Would {ka ce'u me la xod}? I think it would.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think so. He wants to replace kau with this, remember.
> > > >
> > > > ka ce'u me la xod works fine. I don't want to replace every use of makau
> > > > with this, only in those cases where it's being used to hack an identity
> > > > abstractor.
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Could you be so kind as to paraphrase at least *one* du'u makau in
> > > terms of this? I still don't see how this works.
> >
> > le su'u ce'u catra la lauras. kei be lo kamse'i cu slabu mi to
> > .iseni'inaibo le catra cu slabu mi toi
>
> Errr.... You didn't even use it though. I meant in terms of the
> "ka ce'u me la xod" thing.
I created it specifically to address that canonical problem. I'm not sure
what you're asking to see.
--
jipno se kerlo
re mei re mei degji kakne