[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
At 06:33 PM 10/11/02 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
la pycyn cusku di'e
>Where is a {du'u xukau} sense of {jei} espoused in
>CLL (not, I see, in the place where {jei} is indexed, but that seems to be
>SOP for interesting properties)? Nothing I see suggests that {jei ...} is
>a
>set of values rather than the correct value -- or, with {ce'u}, the
>assignment function.
6.3) mi ba jdice le jei
la djordj. cu zekri gasnu [kei]
I [future] decide the truth-value of
(George being-a-(crime doer)).
I will decide whether George is a criminal.
Deciding a truth value is either meaningless or useless.
I thought we decided long ago that this was merely a sumti-raising error that requires a tu'a on the "le jei" because the underlying question is "ledu'u makau du lejei ..."
People have admitted that there were sumti-raising errors in some of the CLL examples.
lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@hidden.email Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org