[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Lionel Vidal scripsit:
> Unfortunately, the CLL itself spoils this idea in lojban by stating that:
> {na pu broda} is exactly the same as {punai broda} (except for emphasis).
> In my understanding of meta-comments, these should be semantically very
> different, with {punai broda} still claiming {broda}, and {na pu broda}
> claiming only {pu broda} as false. The elegance, very subjectively, would
> have been much greater, but this would require a change to the CLL
> that would...., well you know :-)
I agree with this. "Punai" is a hack, and should have had either na'e
semantics or been disallowed. But it has na semantics, and so it goes.
--
If you have ever wondered if you are in hell, John Cowan
it has been said, then you are on a well-traveled http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
road of spiritual inquiry. If you are absolutely http://www.reutershealth.com
sure you are in hell, however, then you must be jcowan@hidden.email
on the Cross Bronx Expressway. --Alan Feur, NYTimes, 2002-09-20