[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Nick: > So, And in http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jboske/message/1732 says that > Unique does work as an intensional: Hang on, though. I end that message by saying I now have big doubts about that, and that I will explain them in message 1736. > I want A Doctor (A Doctor is the kind of thing I want) > I draw A Doctor (A Doctor is the kind of thing I draw) > > And there is a Kind of 6-letter gismu, which you can talk about > wanting, needing, describing, though it may end up having no denotation > > I could start pondering whether that works, but > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jboske/message/1736 (the Big Rethink) > says no, intensional isn't a Unique, because you can intensionally want > masses as well, and the Unique, whatever it is, is an individual. Right? Yes. > So we are indeed back to square one. You know, you'd get your > cross-cutting with ka'ai too: leka'ai, leika'ai, le'ika'ai, lo malkampu > be leika'ai... [Jordan, your football team takes it up the khyber].. I look forward to learning more about ka'ai, then. --And.