[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la lojbab cusku di'e
> >In Lojban, the closest thing we have to "lea" is {piro loi}.
>
> As it was understood in 1987, lea was ro lo, and not piro loi - our loi
> being TLI's lo, there was no tie between lea and lo.
Was there any difference between "lea" and "ra" in 1987?
> The mathematicians took JCB's references to sets literally and they indeed
> wanted a gadri for that mathematical kind of set.
Yes indeed. But JCB didn't give it to them.
> >Our {loi} took the name from JCB's {lo} but the
> >meaning of JCB's {lea}.
>
> I see little resemblance between lea and loi.
Have you read:
http://www.loglan.org/Articles/sets-and-multiples.html
?
That article clearly describes Loglan's "set" as the collective
interpretation of our "mass".
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com