[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))

• From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>
• Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:32:21 -0000
• Subject: RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))
• To: <jboske@yahoogroups.com>

xod:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, And Rosta wrote:
> 
> > So if there's no agent then it's not a catra relationship. It's
> > a se catra be zi'o property. Take a relationship between an agent
> > and an undergoer -- a dier 
> 
> A dier? Or a diar?

I don't know whether this is a joke, but either way I don't understand.
"Dier" = "one who dies", "moriturus".

--And.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))
    • From: Invent Yourself <xod@hidden.email>

• References:
  • RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
    • From: Invent Yourself <xod@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: RE: [jboske] Re: Link on (Intensional) Masses
• Next by Date: TOTALLY OT: philosophy & yawning (was: RE: Lojban is fxxxed
• Previous by thread: RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
• Next by thread: RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread