Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134

From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 17:14:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
To: jboske@yahoogroups.com

Jorge Llambias scripsit:

> (Hopefully you meant to write {pisu'o} in all of the above.)

Oops, yes.

> Ok, in that case we agree. Forget about Mr Fraction.

Good.

-- 
XQuery Blueberry DOM                            John Cowan
Entity parser dot-com                           jcowan@hidden.email
    Abstract schemata                           http://www.reutershealth.com
    XPointer errata                             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Infoset Unicode BOM                                 --Richard Tobin

References:
- Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
  - From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hidden.email>

Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei)
Next by Date: Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei)
Previous by thread: Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
Next by thread: RE: Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread