[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134

• From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hidden.email>
• Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:59:52 +0000
• Subject: Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
• To: jboske@yahoogroups.com

la djan cusku di'e

I think I must have lost track of the context.  Given these sentences:

1) piro loi nanmu cu ki'ogra li 1000
2) piro loi nanmu cu ki'ogra li 1000000
3) piro loi nanmu cu ki'ogra li 1000 .e li 1000000

then I call #1 and #2 true and #3 false.  *Some* fraction weighs 1000 kg,
and *some other* fraction weighs 1 Gg, but *no* fraction weighs both.

(Hopefully you meant to write {pisu'o} in all of the above.)

Ok, in that case we agree. Forget about Mr Fraction.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei)
• Next by Date: Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei)
• Previous by thread: Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
• Next by thread: Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread