[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
I accept most of what you say. At 04:28 AM 1/13/03 +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> it precisely shows the problem of > prescriptive modification of the language as erroneous prescriptions > spread > NOT because they make sense, but because "people who think more about > these > issues" said it should be so. As I keep saying to you: all artificial languages evolve by little cabals, since the communities are so small and the power of the individual so great.
The solution is to make the community much larger. %^)
There is no such thing as natural evolution, which ignores what "people who think more" come up with.
I think we have different ideas what would constitute natural evolution, but it isn't worth arguing now.
lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@hidden.email Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org