[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Jordan:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 03:41:03PM -0000, And Rosta wrote:
> > Jordan:
> [...]
> > The main attraction of ke'a rather than ce'u is among those given
> > on the poi'i wiki page: it allows a simple way to 'reflexives',
> > since multiple ke'a corefer while multiple ce'u cannot corefer
>
> That's what nei is for:
> mi ckaji leka ce'u citka le nei
But once the two coreferential terms are not in the same bridi,
it doesn't work, or at least not without cumbersome subscripting
operating according to unofficial and unagreed conventions.
Also, the meaning of {nei} has not been satisfactorily agreed
on yet.
--And.