[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
John: > And Rosta scripsit: > > > > > Prototype-theorists, i.e. some cognitive psychologists, would want to talk > > > > about (b), but it needn't be built into the fabric of the language. > > > > > > Need not be but is. > > > > Is how? In lo'e? But you and I are in agreement that CLL-lo'e is more > > general than Prototype. > > Exactly. It's le'e that is prototype, or perhaps more precisely my-prototype. I don't see why le'e should be any different from lo'e. In a context where lo'i jbopre cu du le'i prenu, it will be the case that lo'e jbopre cu du le'e prenu. --And.