[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system)



And Rosta scripsit:

> > > Prototype-theorists, i.e. some cognitive psychologists, would want to talk
> > > about (b), but it needn't be built into the fabric of the language.
> >
> > Need not be but is.
> 
> Is how? In lo'e? But you and I are in agreement that CLL-lo'e is more
> general than Prototype.

Exactly.  It's le'e that is prototype, or perhaps more precisely my-prototype.

-- 
As you read this, I don't want you to feel      John Cowan 
sorry for me, because, I believe everyone       jcowan@hidden.email
will die someday.    -- From a Nigerian-type    http://www.reutershealth.com
                        scam spam I got         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan