[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
xorxes:
> la adam cusku di'e
>
> >(I repeated the sentence above, instead of using 'e', because I take
> >the prenex to remain the in the expansion of 'lo broda cu brode ko'a
> >e ko'e' to 'da poi broda zo'u ge da brode ko'a gi da brode ko'e'
> >Has there been any discussion or consensus about this?)
>
> There has been discussion from time to time, I'm not sure about
> consensus. I agree with your interpretation. The term with {e}
> has the same scope that a term with {ro} would have in that
> position
I agree with both of you. I think it's the only really tenable position.
AFAICR, nobody has tried to defend the alternative view, except with
naive citations of CLL, where CLL is trying to be didactic rather
than definitive.
--And.