[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la djorden. cusku di'e >Seems that a lot of use of mu'ei is either going to be ro or su'o. >(probably mostly the former). What about making a pair of cmavo >in selma'o TAhE (roi doesn't allow having a default for the number) >which do that? If the one for ro could be single syllable it would >be all the better: perhaps 'xau'. Not sure if the one for su'o is >as useful, and as such if it's even worth creating I'd definitely >not recommend a xVV for it. The su'o version is, I think, exactly ka'e, and I've already proposed an experimental cmavo for the ro version: bi'ai. I agree that bi'ai might be a bit long, though. Maybe we should wait and see for sure. >(note that doing as such would make for counterfactual conditionals >taking no more syllables than indicative ones: mi xaugi xagji gi >citka vs. mi ganai xagji gi citka). I would say: mi bi'ai gi xagji gi citka. mu'o mi'e .adam.