[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Is there any difference between having these cmavo in TAhE as opposed to CAhA? > la djorden. cusku di'e > > >Seems that a lot of use of mu'ei is either going to be ro or su'o > >(probably mostly the former). What about making a pair of cmavo > >in selma'o TAhE (roi doesn't allow having a default for the number) > >which do that? If the one for ro could be single syllable it would > >be all the better: perhaps 'xau'. Not sure if the one for su'o is > >as useful, and as such if it's even worth creating I'd definitely > >not recommend a xVV for it > > The su'o version is, I think, exactly ka'e, and I've already proposed > an experimental cmavo for the ro version: bi'ai. I agree that bi'ai > might be a bit long, though. Maybe we should wait and see for sure > > >(note that doing as such would make for counterfactual conditionals > >taking no more syllables than indicative ones: mi xaugi xagji gi > >citka vs. mi ganai xagji gi citka) > > I would say: mi bi'ai gi xagji gi citka > > mu'o mi'e .adam