[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
xod: > So the only rational, meaningful position which you might mean is "I > reject jboske when not done for the intent of usage". But even And Rosta > falls within that category; he intends his work to be used, just not by > him. I don't intend to not use it myself, though. It will depend on how I feel about the final product: will it feel better than English, or worse? SL is definitely worse, to me. And I'll never be able to escape some revolting bits that are too entrenched to ever be abolishable (e.g. rafsi). But conceivably Lojban might evolve to a point where the good outweighs the bad. Incidentally, even if I did learn it, I would, like you, not be learning it in order to communicate. This is because almost none of the people I will want to communicate with will be fluent in Lojban. --And.