[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134



And Rosta scripsit:


> because, as xorxes notes, it leads to errors like saying 
> "loi nanmu weighs 100kg e 1000kg" is true.

I hold that to be true, not false.  It's possible to say all sorts
of things that look contrary about masses, that being the nature of them.
Of course, straight negations like "loi nanmu na -weighs 1000 kg" are
still false.

-- 
A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me: jcowan@hidden.email]
Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
    "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If it only had metre                http://www.reutershealth.com
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay