[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la xod cusku di'e
> No, even in that context I can't interpret it as {bai noda}.
> It's always {bai zo'e}, and {zo'e} can't be {noda}.
Not even if noda is the commonly understood value? I believe your fi'o
rebla is zo'e; it's noda.
"Your fi'o rebla" is not grammatical, if we can talk of a Jboglish
grammar, so I don't know what you mean by that. If you tell me
{do fi'o rebla fe'u prenu}, I will assume you think I have a tail.
The same if you say {do se rebla [zo'e]}.
> > > Unless you meant to use > > > {li pa} not to refer to the number 1, but rather to the > > > function that maps any value of the range to the number 1. > >> >Yes, that's how lipa should be interpreted when in the le velfancu place.> > I see, but that's not how I understand the language. {li pa} > for me is the number 1, not a function that takes the number > 1 as a value. I never said that it took the number 1 as a value, but the converse: it always spits out "1".
I thought that the value that a function takes is the one that it spits. The sine function takes values in the -1 to +1 range. Is that wrong? mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com