[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c



On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group wrote:


> Frankly I don't give a shit what has been discussed on jboske by 3% of the
> Lojban community, while the rest were doing their best to tune out.



The people who refuse to think about issues hardly have the same
argumentation weight as those who do. It behooves all involved to either
establish their own opinions on basis of independent judgement, or to
respect and follow the thoughts of those who have applied more effort. But
to refuse to do the former, and disdain the latter, is indefensible.



> I think the answer is already determined, and the word will split in
> two.  But I am not interested in finding answers until the byfy is
> constituted.  I already know that one person is somewhat resentful that
> byfy issues are being debated on jboske while the others await a forum that
> is worth participating in.  jboske isn't, for them.




I find this unfair. jboske is where one particular subset or faction is
getting its story straight, among themselves, prior to the BF. Would you
rather it work out its internal affairs during BF time, distracting the
other BF participants, and delaying the proceedings?





-- 
// if (!terrorist)
// ignore ();
// else
collect_data ();