Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi

From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:00:52 -0400
Subject: Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
To: jboske@yahoogroups.com

And Rosta scripsit:

> As discussed 6 months ago, I think this is an odious & egregious 
> inconsistency in Lojban. However, if I pretend you were talking
> about du'u rather than nu, then we can let this issue go unrediscussed
> for the time being.

IIRC, you believe that da nu la liz. brito turni .ijo la liz. brito turni,
whereas I believe that da nu la liz. brito turni .iju la liz. brito turni.
Correct?

-- 
Only do what only you can do.           John Cowan <jcowan@hidden.email>
  --Edsger W. Dijkstra,                 http://www.reutershealth.com
    deceased 6 August 2002              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
  - From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@hidden.email>
- RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>

References:
- RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@hidden.email>
- RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>