[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi



On Thu, 29 May 2003, And Rosta wrote:

> John:
> > And Rosta scripsit:
> >
> > > But in brief, the "FOR" creates
> > > a logical abstraction such that the quantifier on the x2 is
> > > *within* the abstraction. (For example, "This is a knife for
> > > cutting a coconut" should not entail "There is a coconut that
> > > this a knife for cutting".)
> >
> > I'm not sure I believe this.  Let's talk about breadknives rather
> > than mythical coconut knives (you need something more like an ax than
> > a knife!), and let's look at the contingent falsity of the negated
> > version of the implicature rather than the necessary truth of a positive
> > implicature.  I take it that this procedure is licit; if not, let's
> > discuss it
> >
> > I then rewrite your claim as saying:  "This is a knife for cutting bread"
> > is consistent with the falsity of "There is some bread that this is a
> > knife for cutting".  Now I admit that "There is some bread that this
> > knife cuts" might be false, but if there is no bread whatsoever that
> > this knife is suited to cut, then I deny that it is a breadknife.  So as
> > long as the "for" appears in both the original and the rewritten forms,
> > I conclude there is no scoping problem
>
> Unless I am missing something, this is just a recapitulation of the
> "I need a doctor" discussion.
>
> Consider:
>
>   This is a scheme for turning lead into gold.
>   This is a knife for cutting the foreskins off snails.
>   This is a spoon for ladling out any leftovers.
>
> None of these entail that there is an event of lead turning into gold,
> that there is a snail's foreskin, or that there are any leftovers.



In Lojban, events can "exist" without them ever having to have occurred
(yet). So it is definitely a leftover spoon if it's intended to be used in
case there are any leftovers, regardless of there being any leftovers
right now. However, in "need a doctor", the Doctor isn't wrapped in a NU
clause, and worse yet, might be tagged with an o-gadri.



-- 
.o'i mu xagji sofybakni cu zvati le purdi
[Caution!] There are five hungry Soviet cows in the garden!