RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi

From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 00:53:45 +0100
Subject: RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
To: <jboske@yahoogroups.com>

John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> 
> > As discussed 6 months ago, I think this is an odious & egregious 
> > inconsistency in Lojban. However, if I pretend you were talking
> > about du'u rather than nu, then we can let this issue go unrediscussed
> > for the time being 
> 
> IIRC, you believe that da nu la liz. brito turni .ijo la liz. brito turni,
> whereas I believe that da nu la liz. brito turni .iju la liz. brito turni 
> Correct?

Yes, provided each clause contains the same CAhA.

--And.

References:
- Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>