Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi

From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:24:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
To: jboske@yahoogroups.com

Jordan DeLong scripsit:

> More pointedly, you believe that {da ca'a nu la liz. brito turni
> .iju la liz. brito turni}, correct?

Yes.

-- 
H)Bíggledy-pìggledy / XML programmers       John Cowan
Try to escape those / I-eighteen-N woes;        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Incontrovertibly / What we need more of is      http://www.reutershealth.com
Unicode weenies and / Fran)Bçois Yergeaus.     jcowan@hidden.email

References:
- RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@hidden.email>
- RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>
- Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>
- Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
  - From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@hidden.email>

Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
Next by Date: Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation (was: RE: taksi
Previous by thread: Re: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
Next by thread: RE: [jboske] "x1 is a Y for doing x2" (was: RE: Re: antiblotation(was: RE: taksi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread