[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, John Cowan wrote: > Invent Yourself scripsit: > > > Where does the book say that lo broda === da poi broda, that is, that lo > > broda should be treated like it introduces a prenex variable? I would like > > to hear John Cowan's views on this topic. > > I have no views on where the book says such a thing. Grep is your friend. > > As for my view on whether the claim is true, I think it is, and am amply > on record as having thought so for a very long time. So are many other > Lojbanists; in fact, I know of no one except Bob (and perhaps pc, but > I have no way of being sure) who is on record to the contrary. Do you sanction all that Jorge is recently saying concerning the "scope" of lo broda? What about the placement of tense sumtcita phrases? -- Henry McCullers, an affable Plano, TX-area anti-Semite, praised the Jewish people Monday for doing "a bang-up job" running the media. "This has been such a great year for movies, and the new crop of fall TV shows looks to be one of the best in years," McCullers said. "And the cable news channels are doing a terrific job, too. Admittedly, they're not reporting on the Jewish stranglehold on world finance, but, hey, that's understandable."