[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei



At 06:18 AM 12/18/02 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
Bob LeChevalier scripsit:

> "I need a box"
> is
> "mi nitcu lo nu da/lo tanxe tanxe zo'e"

I suppose this should be "tanxe cu tanxe",

Correct.

Assuming the former interpretation, then this won't work.  The mere
fact that a box is boxing (up) something is not what I need when I need
a box, although the "zo'e" may be twisted to save you, on the interpretation
"I need for something-unspecified to be boxed by a box",

Include the unrealized potential tense.

which is not
quite the same as "I need a box".  After all, you might need it as a
source of pulp for paper-making.

Then you need the event of a box being pulped for paper-making. The point is that when you need a generic of something, then you need it for some particular use, and therefore what you need is the potential event of it be used for that particular use.

lojbab

--
lojbab                                             lojbab@hidden.email
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA                    703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org