[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei



At 11:57 PM 12/17/02 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
la djan cusku di'e

> > I agree with that last bit. On the other hand, {mi nitcu loi mikce}
> > says that there is some fraction of the mass of doctors such
> > that I need that fraction. Not what we want.
>
>Au contraire, I think it is exactly what we want (if we can dismiss
>the "sundry detached doctor parts" interpretation).

I don't think {loi mikce} can refer to detached doctor parts.
That has to be {loi mikce pagbu}. {loi mikce} can only be some
doctors collectively, but only doctors, not doctor parts.

But {mi nitcu loi mikce} says that there is some group of doctors
(possibly a singleton) such that I need that group. That's not
the usual meaning of "I need a doctor".

The usual meaning is more like
"mi nitcu lo nu da/lo mikce cu mikce mi"

which suggests that

"I need a box"
is
"mi nitcu lo nu da/lo tanxe tanxe zo'e"

Feel free to add/replace ce'u if applicable.

lojbab

--
lojbab                                             lojbab@hidden.email
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA                    703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org