RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u

From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:52:53 -0000
Subject: RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
To: <jboske@yahoogroups.com>

Lojbab:
> Long scope prenex before connected sentences requires forethought, and 
> hence tu'e/tu'u, which is probably an underutilized feature of the language 

Definitely. "+1". (This message sent because it's nice to point out
occasions when we agree!)

--And.

References:
- Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  - From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@hidden.email>

Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
Next by Date: jboske & linguistics (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
Previous by thread: Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
Next by thread: Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread