[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 03:33:47PM +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote:
[...]
> But I wonder whether it would not be worthwhile to grant the
> equivalence {lo ka ce'u mlatu} = {lo'i mlatu}....
i) "lo ka" is semantically wrong. "le ka" is correct.
ii) "ka" are propositions with free variables. "lo'i mlatu" and
"leka ce'u mlatu" refer to different things (the former refers to
the class of all cats, and the latter to a function which will give
you du'us when you give it variables). "lo'i mlatu" is "lu'i ro
ckaji be leka ce'u mlatu", though.
[ Once again, didn't read most of this message. ]
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@hidden.email
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
binBseCY90KGA.bin
Description: application/ygp-stripped