[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] lo'e, le'e



On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 pycyn@hidden.email wrote:

> In a message dated 10/18/2002 5:39:51 AM Central Daylight Time,
> a.rosta@hidden.email writes:
>
> <<
> > Fair enough, but on this point I become a xodite: when applied to
> > classes that appear to be non-singleton (with 0 or more than 1 members),
> > lo'e/le'e force us into a new world-view. In such a case it is
> > perfectly legitimate for you say "I have no inkling what this means"
> > or "I have an inkling, but when I think it through it just doesn't
> > stand up", but part of its appeal is precisely that it coerces a
> > novel world-view onto the underlying 'facts' of the universe.
> >>
> Building koans into the language defeats the whole point of koans, which work
> by using the ordinary to force the extraordinary.  Something labelled "this
> is to make you see the extraordinary" is just going to fail -- and lead to
> frustration.  It is not the job of langauge to force a new world view but to
> give means to decribe the world of a given view adequately.



But isn't that the goal of the project! JCB didn't have a bizarre
worldview which he Loglan to express.


 It is a bonus
> that that means can also -- properly used -- force a reconceptualization of
> the world.  In Lojban terms, putting in a word that is claimed to have a
> Whorfian effect, pretty much guarantees that it won't -- and it clutters up
> the language with useless detritus.


What if we create a word that's very hard to describe in English? And make
it a short word with a grammar that permits it to be used commonly?




  Better, I think, to drop {lo'e}
> altogether or give it a meaning within the langauge as now bound.  Especially
> when there is a pretty useful thing it could do (and historically has done,
> albeit confusedly).
>

-- 
Henry McCullers, an affable Plano, TX-area anti-Semite, praised the
Jewish people Monday for doing "a bang-up job" running the media.
"This has been such a great year for movies, and the new crop of fall
TV shows looks to be one of the best in years," McCullers said.
"And the cable news channels are doing a terrific job, too. Admittedly,
they're not reporting on the Jewish stranglehold on world finance,
but, hey, that's understandable."