[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Jorge Llamb��)B�as scripsit: > I think that the problem is that the Kind has more "roi"s available > than the avatars. There is a dimension in which each avatar is > stuck to one roi. So, using fe'ei to convert to the avatar dimension, > I would say "-Mr. cipni fe'eisu'oroi noroi fe'esu'oroi spati citka" > is true. i.e. "Mr. Bird for some avatar never eats plants anywhere", > i.e. "Mr. Bird for some avatar is carnivorous". You insist on talking about the properties of the avatars of Mr. Bird, whereas I am talking the properties of Mr. Bird himself. It's true that some avatars of Mr. Bird cu na blanu, but not that Mr. Bird himself cu na blanu. -- Is a chair finely made tragic or comic? Is the John Cowan portrait of Mona Lisa good if I desire to see jcowan@hidden.email it? Is the bust of Sir Philip Crampton lyrical, www.ccil.org/~cowan epical or dramatic? If a man hacking in fury www.reutershealth.com at a block of wood make there an image of a cow, is that image a work of art? If not, why not? --Stephen Dedalus