[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] ni ce'u (was: RE: The ugly head of ni



On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, And Rosta wrote:

> John:
> > Invent Yourself scripsit:
> >
> > > If ni uses ce'u, then it can't express "the degree to which", because
> > > that's an abstraction of a filled bridi. If ni doesn't need ce'u, then it
> > > makes sense, but loses its symmetry with ka, and becomes completely
> > > identical to jei.
> >
> > Oho!
> >
> > This gives me an idea.
> >


...



> > Comments?
>
> I'm not sure if you silently dropped this idea. I can make no sense of
> ni + ce'u.


This is what happened to it:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jboske/message/272





-- 
Henry McCullers, an affable Plano, TX-area anti-Semite, praised the
Jewish people Monday for doing "a bang-up job" running the media.
"This has been such a great year for movies, and the new crop of fall
TV shows looks to be one of the best in years," McCullers said.
"And the cable news channels are doing a terrific job, too. Admittedly,
they're not reporting on the Jewish stranglehold on world finance,
but, hey, that's understandable."