[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la and cusku di'e > Certainly this is preferable -- to use na'o (or ta'e?) when typicality is > being talked about. > > But we're not at the stage -- either analytically or politically -- where > we can productively start discussing reassignment of cmavo. Ok, I'm not in a hurry. In any case, today's discussion has been extremely productive for me, because I finally can understand CLL-lo'e. If the equation CLL-lo'e = ka'u + Kind-lo'e + na'o(or ta'e) is generally accepted then this will clarify our arguments enormously. As for reassignment, in my case lo'e was assigned to Kind in 1994 so restricting it to CLL-lo'e would constitute the reassignment. But I'm willing to wait and evaluate all options. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com