[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u



And Rosta scripsit:

> It depends what "explain {le'e}" means. In earlier discussion I
> explained how the meaning "stereotypical" was arrived at, but
> argued that it was inconsistent with the regular relation between
> o-gadri and e-gadri and that the meaning {le'e} should have is
> clear but other than "stereotypical". 

CLL 6.5 explicitly debunks this term as only semi-appropriate.
In fact le'e = lo'e me le, the result of myopically singularizing
the critters you have in mind.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@hidden.email  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
"The exception proves the rule."  Dimbulbs think: "Your counterexample proves
my theory."  Latin students think "'Probat' means 'tests': the exception puts
the rule to the proof."  But legal historians know it means "Evidence for an
exception is evidence of the existence of a rule in cases not excepted from."