[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] lo'e

Xod:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> > Yes, I don't mind disagreeing with CLL 
> 
> I haven't yet seen an explanation of what's so broken with the CLL
> definition or usage of lo'e 

It's not broken. It's incomplete/vague/underspecified.

(I do think le'e is broken, though, but I have discussed this in
another message.)

--And.