[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:ConcreteexamplesofLlambanlo'e



On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, And Rosta wrote:


> plain le = ro da poi cmima le'i



How sure are you of this?


>
> > Where does the book say that lo broda === da poi broda, that is, that
> lo
> > broda should be treated like it introduces a prenex variable? I would
> like
> > to hear John Cowan's views on this topic
>
> i Don't know, but CLL is a reference grammar, to a large extent
> didactic in function, and does not necessarily set down in print
> all the lore accumulated on lojban list over the years.




On the other hand, that apocryphal corpus can be legally ignored.




-- 
Henry McCullers, an affable Plano, TX-area anti-Semite, praised the
Jewish people Monday for doing "a bang-up job" running the media.
"This has been such a great year for movies, and the new crop of fall
TV shows looks to be one of the best in years," McCullers said.
"And the cable news channels are doing a terrific job, too. Admittedly,
they're not reporting on the Jewish stranglehold on world finance,
but, hey, that's understandable."