[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer




la and cusku di'e

For the contexts under consideration -- counting plise and quantifying
djedi -- it is desirable to exclude 0.0, but to allow 0.1, 2.1, etc.

{za'u pi no} excludes 0.0
{su'o pi no} includes 0.0

Both allow .1, 2.1, etc.

{za'u no} excludes 0
{su'o no} includes 0

Both allow 1, 2, 3, etc.

So would you propose tu'opino and tu'opitu'o? If so, I should add it
to the wiki.

I find {pino} as a mark of integer to be extremely odd. It says
that reals are allowed in that context, even if the particular
instance happens to be an integer.

mu'o mi'e xorxes






_________________________________________________________________
Broadband?�Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp